Mr. Chayes. I think you do have it in the report. Again it is in the answer to question 13, page 3 of that answer, if you see there it says, "In the promissory note"—it is about the middle of the page—"which he signed for the loan he stated, section 423.6-5 that 'I further understand and agree that after my repatriation I will not be furnished a passport for travel abroad until my obligation to reimburse the Treasurer of the United States is liquidated.'"
Mr. Coleman. You testified that you made a search of the records or you had a search made of the records of the Department, and you conclude that no lookout card was ever prepared.
Mr. Chayes. Yes; we can't find any evidence that a lookout card might have been prepared.
Mr. Coleman. Do you know why one was not prepared?
Mr. Chayes. There could have been more than one reason. It could have been simply a bureaucratic oversight. It could have been that they didn't have date and place of birth information on Oswald.
Because of the possibility of identical names, the practice of the Passport Office is not to prepare a lookout card on any individual on the basis of his name alone. They need both name and date and place of birth.
Now, it may have been either that the Finance Office failed to notify the Passport Office because it did not have date and place of birth information, or that it did notify the Passport Office, and because there was no date and place of birth information, the Passport Office did not make a card.
Mr. Dulles. But the Passport Office had that information.
Mr. Chayes. The Passport Office had the date and place of birth information on Lee Harvey Oswald; yes.
Mr. Dulles. But not on Marina?