Mr. Eisenberg. So that the presence of that same feature as a retouch in both photographs might be coincidental, or at least might not have been done by the same person?
Mr. Shaneyfelt. That is correct.
Mr. Eisenberg. And in your mind that similarity of feature does not preclude the possibility that a completely unretouched photo was submitted by the Detroit Free Press to Newsweek?
Mr. Shaneyfelt. That is right.
Mr. Eisenberg. Now, Mr. Shaneyfelt, I hand you page 30 of the New York Times, issue of February 19, 1964, which again contains a photograph similar to those you have been testifying as to—and which page I have marked Shaneyfelt Exhibit No. 6—and I ask you whether you have examined that photograph?
Mr. Shaneyfelt. Yes; I have.
Mr. Eisenberg. And what is your conclusion concerning that photograph, Mr. Shaneyfelt?
Mr. Shaneyfelt. I found this to be generally similar in all visible characteristics to the photograph which is Commission Exhibit No. 133-A, and found no differences to suggest that it is other than the same photograph as Exhibit No. 133-A. However, the lack of detail in the halftone reproduction on Shaneyfelt Exhibit No. 6 precludes a positive identification with Commission Exhibit No. 133-A.
Mr. Eisenberg. Do you see any retouching in this photograph, Mr. Shaneyfelt?
Mr. Shaneyfelt. Yes, I do.