Mr. De Mohrenschildt. I think they should have—in my opinion, they shouldn't have let him come back to the United States—No. 1.
And No. 2, the people like us should have been protected against even knowing people like Oswald. Maybe I am wrong in that respect.
Mr. Jenner. Well, it is an opinion. That is all I am asking you for.
Mr. De Mohrenschildt. And thirdly, Oswald was known as a violent character, especially in the last time. He was known, as I read from the papers, that he participated in pro-Castro demonstrations in New Orleans. That is what I read in the papers. And so therefore, he should have been kept away from Dallas when the President was there.
Mr. Jenner. Mr. Reporter, would you mark the Auchincloss letter, dated February 2, 1964, and its accompanying envelope as De Mohrenschildt Exhibits 12 and 13, respectively?
(The documents referred to were marked "De Mohrenschildt Exhibits 12 and 13," for identification.)
Mr. Jenner. And the Auchincloss letter of December 12, 1963, and its accompanying envelope as De Mohrenschildt Exhibits 14 and 15, respectively.
(The documents referred to were marked "De Mohrenschildt Exhibits 14 and 15," for identification.)
Mr. De Mohrenschildt. All these contracts in Haiti have been made official by an act of Congress of Haiti on March 13, 1963, and signed by the president of the country and by all the ministers, stipulating that the price of the geological survey would be $285,000, and the consideration for it will be the concession of the sisal in Haiti, originally an American company called Shada, built by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and developed during the war, and later on sold to the Haitian Government. This concession is given to me for the duration of 10 years, with an extended duration of 10 years more. I think that will explain it.
Mr. Jenner. Fine.