Mr. Liebeler. But they didn't have scopes on them?
Mr. Slack. They didn't have scopes on them.
Mr. Liebeler. But you remember that the rifle you saw at the range did have the barrel cut off and didn't have the sight on the front so it couldn't have been this rifle?
Mr. Slack. I would say that. I would say that is not it, because the sporterized rifle, the shiny new one, I don't think it had the metal binding on it. The top wood, so this holds the top wood. Now, that is the type of rifle, see what I mean. But I really notice things about rifles like a jewelry man or a lady would about the setting of a ring. I wouldn't know—but I know rifles.
Mr. Liebeler. But this was the same general type of rifle as the one you saw that had been sporterized and had the wood cut off?
Mr. Slack. This is a magazine. You recognize one of them a mile off.
Mr. Liebeler. Let me show you some pictures of a man or some men that have been previously marked Commission Exhibits 451 and 453 through 456. I want to ask you if this looks like either one of the men that you saw at the rifle range on the 17th of November?
Mr. Slack. The jacket was the first thing I remembered. When they described the jacket in the paper before I even looked at the fellow, because the man pulled a jacket off and put it on top of a load of sand you used it for a pad to shoot from——
Mr. Liebeler. Is that the guy you saw? Does anyone in those pictures look like him?
Mr. Slack. Those heavy eyebrows and that part in the hair, but apparently he had more hair. Maybe he got a haircut afterwards.