Mr. Wilcox. That's right. Mr. Lewis later told me that it might have been a money order draft that could have been paid to some individual in our town, and that the party holding the draft had presented it at our office for payment, but was having difficulty in producing suitable identification for us to cash the draft. In that event, we would not have any message or record of message in our file locally.
Mr. Liebeler. If I understand you correctly, Mr. Wilcox, the situation which you just described would occur when a money order telegram had been delivered to some party at some other office, some office other than the Dallas central office?
Mr. Wilcox. That's right.
Mr. Liebeler. And he would have the draft in his hand that would have been delivered to him by the telegraph company in some other office, and then he would come to the Dallas central office and attempt to cash that draft; is that correct?
Mr. Wilcox. Yes.
Mr. Liebeler. And Mr. Lewis said it is possible that the transaction with which he had such difficulty could have been a transaction such as the one we have described; is that correct?
Mr. Wilcox. Yes, sir.
Mr. Liebeler. In that event, you would not have any record of it in the Dallas office?
Mr. Wilcox. No, sir.
Mr. Liebeler. Is it correct that you would not have any record of it in the Dallas office even when the draft had been successfully cashed, as it apparently subsequently was in this case?