Mr. Jenner. Now, does the recording there indicate a reference of a job to the applicant and the result of that reference—what happened after the reference was made?
Mrs. Cunningham. The record is not absolutely complete, but in general—yes—and some line entries—yes.
Mr. Jenner. Would that form necessarily indicate if the applicant refused the position as distinguished from the possibility, for example, that the employer, when he interviewed the applicant, concluded that he did not wish to employ him?
Mrs. Cunningham. There is some indication of each, yes.
Mr. Jenner. Now, taking those entries, would you comment on each of them in that respect, taking them seriatically and tell us about it.
Mrs. Cunningham. On the first line entry, in the column headed "Call" there is a dash. That indicates to me that the applicant was not called in, that he was in the office and referred to the placement section. On the same line, under the word "referred" there is a date—10-8, which is struck through, and above that is written "10-10" and then under the heading, "Employer or agency," I am reading the entry there, "Harrel and Harrington, architects;" under job title or purpose, the word "Messenger"; under the abbreviation for duration, the letter "P" which indicates a permanent job; under "pay", I am reading $1.50.
Mr. Jenner. Per hour?
Mrs. Cunningham. The hour is not indicated—that is inferred. There is no entry under "results". On the same line under "remarks" are the initials "LL".
Mr. Jenner. Whose initials are those?
Mrs. Cunningham. Placement worker who was with us formerly, whose name is Louise Latham.