Mr. Newman. Not necessarily. I am leaving it up to you.
Mr. Hubert. As I say, I don't know what the question was last night about identification, and you have brought this matter up; I am perfectly willing to hear what you have to say about it. I think it would be better, if you comment about it, to put it in the record, but on the other hand maybe it wouldn't be necessary. Why don't you say what you have to say about it and then we can judge better?
Mr. Newman. As near as I can recall, when he was questioning me about what officers I had seen in the basement that morning whom I knew, and the subject came up that I had seen one man but I could not remember his name. He asked me at that time for a description of him and I gave it to him. After looking at that picture last night when I got home, and with the list of names I had for the picture, I can now give the man's name, if you would like it.
Mr. Hubert. Yes; go ahead.
Mr. Newman. Third from the left—second from the left on the back row. Casten, Jerome Casten.
Mr. Hubert. Jerome Casten. Now, that was the reserve officer that Mr. Griffin was questioning you about last night, and, as I understand it, you testified that you did remember seeing a man, and you gave his description, but at that time you did not know his name?
Mr. Newman. That's correct.
Mr. Hubert. With the aid of this picture, which as I understand, is a class picture—I see Captain Solomon there, by the way—you identified him as the second man in the top row from the left, and you stated his name to be——
Mr. Newman. Jerome Casten.
Mr. Hubert. Jerome Casten. I think it would be better if you would allow this to go in. I am, therefore, marking the picture on the reverse side thereof by placing the following on it, to wit: "Dallas, Texas, March 26, 1964. Exhibit 5038-E, deposition of W. J. Newman." Then I am signing my name below that, I am placing an "X" over the man you have identified, and placing my initials next to the "X"; is that correct, sir?