Mr. Hubert. Well, we are interested of course only in the Ruby ones. But you testified a little while ago, and you seemed to be referring to notes, about what Ruby said, and what happened and so forth in the first interview, and then also in the second interview.
The notes that you referred to on both occasions were made contemporaneously with the interview. That is, they were not made at a later date?
Mr. Sorrels. That is correct. Now, there is other stuff in this notebook. Like I went up to the identification bureau to check on his record and so forth, and got his detailed description, and his fingerprint classification—that had nothing to do with the interview.
Mr. Griffin. I think we ought to take that to show what the practice was.
Mr. Hubert. If you do not mind, we will have them photostated, and after we get the photostats, we will get them an identification number.
Suppose you tell us, then, what occurred at the second interview?
Mr. Sorrels. Continuing with what I started out with a moment ago there, he—incidentally, I have noted here on this page where I made these notations “3:15 p.m.,” I assume that is possibly the time this interrogation took place.
I do have the date, “11-24-63.”
Mr. Hubert. The beginning of the notes relating to the interview in Captain Fritz’ office?
Mr. Sorrels. That is right.