Mr. Huffaker. First of all, in the second line as it first appears and in its subsequent appearances the call letters of my station are incorrect. It should be—rather than KLRD—it should be KRLD.
Mr. Hubert. And that’s true throughout the document, if it appears as KLRD it should be KRLD?
Mr. Huffaker. Right—that’s correct.
Mr. Hubert. Have you any other changes or corrections to make?
Mr. Huffaker. Well, just to be exactly specific, the last sentence in the second paragraph.
Mr. Hubert. Now, that sentence reads as follows: “He even noted they were checking police automobiles parked in the area.” Now, addressing yourself to that sentence, what comment do you wish to make?
Mr. Huffaker. Well, it should be—it should have referred to the fact that I did note Sergeant Putnam check a police van which was driven down into the basement.
Mr. Hubert. And that’s the only vehicle that you saw them check?
Mr. Huffaker. That’s the only one that I saw them check.
Mr. Hubert. So, that you think that the quoted sentence is too broad in that it intimates you saw them checking several automobiles, whereas, in fact, you had reference there to only one, as you have identified it a moment ago?