Mr. Hubert. Has there been anything omitted here that was brought out in the trial of Ruby when you were a witness?
Mr. Walker. No; in fact, it has been covered much better. The State didn’t bring out the fact that we saw mug shots, and the defense kind of tore me up on that.
Mr. Hubert. Well, when the defense tore you up, I suppose what they were trying to do is say you simply couldn’t recall?
Mr. Walker. They asked me how long I had known Ruby, which I did not know him, and they were trying to——
Mr. Hubert. Did you give the explanation as to the mug shots?
Mr. Walker. No, sir; I did not.
Mr. Hubert. But it is a fact that the mug shots, that your connection between the mug shots did in fact take place?
Mr. Walker. Yes, sir; that is the only real tie, is the fact that we had the mug shots. I probably wouldn’t have remembered the man coming to the window if it hadn’t been for the mug shots. I told District Attorney Wade that before I went in as a witness, but he didn’t follow it up.
Mr. Hubert. Well, to wrap it up, you are saying under oath now that the man at the window and the man in the mug shots and the man in the courtroom identified as Jack Ruby were one and the same person?
Mr. Walker. Yes, sir.