Mr. Hubert. I have marked for identification a document which purports to be an interview on December 2, 1963, of you by FBI Agent Jack Peden, and for purposes of identification I have marked it as follows: “Dallas, Tex., May 28, 1964, Exhibit No. 3 of the deposition of Eva Grant,” and I have signed my name and ask you the same comments with respect to that document?
Mrs. Grant (examining instrument referred to). It’s going back so far—yes; this is correct, but there are a lot of things that happened, other things.
Mr. Hubert. Yes; we understand that.
Mr. Burleson. But this is correct as far as it goes, and as far as it states?
Mrs. Grant. That’s right.
Mr. Burleson. There are other matters, but we won’t go into those at this particular time—this is true and correct?
Mrs. Grant. I mean, if you look at those States, and then look at those, you would think I was in both places at one time, but it wasn’t like that.
Mr. Burleson. All right, but this is true as far as it goes?
Mrs. Grant. Yes; of course, there are some—who remembers everything—I had a little restaurant.
Mr. Hubert. Now, we’ll get to the next document, which is a report of an interview on December 31, 1963, between FBI Agent Gaston Thompson and yourself, which I have marked for identification, “Dallas, Tex., May 28, 1964, Exhibit No. 4, deposition of Eva Grant,” and I have signed my name, and I ask you if that is correct and if there are any additions or omissions, and if so please state what you think is incorrect as to that document?