Mr. Hubert. In other words, you want to delete the word “Brothers” and add the word “Company”?
Mr. Newnam. Yes, sir.
Mr. Hubert. Otherwise, Exhibit No. 1 is correct; is that right?
Mr. Newnam. Yes.
Mr. Hubert. Now, I invite your attention to a document which I have identified as follows: “Dallas, Texas, June 26, 1964, Exhibit No. 2, Deposition of John Newnam,” and I have signed my name below that inscription, and it purports to be an interview of you by Mr. Jack Peden on December 10, 1963, and I think you’ve read it, and I ask you if that’s a correct report of the interview?
Mr. Newnam. It is, sir.
Mr. Hubert. Finally, I have handed to you previously a document purporting to be a transcription of your testimony during the Ruby trial, which runs from numbered pages 28 through 46, and for the purpose of identification, I have marked page 28 as follows: “Dallas, Texas, June 26, 1964, Exhibit No. 3, Deposition of John Newnam,” and I have signed my name below that and I have placed my initials in the lower right-hand corner of all the subsequent pages. I think you have read this document I have identified as Exhibit No. 3, have you not?
Mr. Newnam. Yes, sir.
Mr. Hubert. According to your recollection, is that a correct transcription of the questions asked you and of the answers given by you?
Mr. Newnam. Yes, sir.