Mr. Hubert. Now, the next paragraph—there is a little question mark on the left-hand margin and I ask you what you have in mind there?
Mr. Saunders. Well, this was just conjecture on my part, just as any other person following the various news medias that Jack Ruby had previously to the shooting of Oswald been down to the Western Union office and wired money to a girl in Houston, I believe it was, and then it was reported that he had a large sum of money on his person at the time of the shooting of Oswald. My conjecture was he might have had a gun with him for those reasons, strictly from past experiences where I knew he had a gun about his person or in a paper sack when he had extra large sums of money with him.
Mr. Hubert. In other words, it’s conjecture on your part?
Mr. Saunders. Right.
Mr. Hubert. And I think the way the statement reads it indicates it is conjecture?
Mr. Saunders. Well, that’s fine, but I did want that brought out that it is not a positive statement.
Mr. Hubert. It’s not based on any facts you know about, but it’s your estimate of the situation from what you knew of him and of his operations?
Mr. Saunders. Right.
Mr. Hubert. Now, I see your question mark as to the last paragraph too?
Mr. Saunders. Oh, this is just my question here in regards to his telling me he had an injunction against another club advertising amateur nights of strippers. His point which he was attempting to show me one day—the injunction, which at the moment I was busy and didn’t have time to wait for him and excused myself—I did not see an injunction and this was just his word, and it was just the fact that these amateur nights as such—my understanding of the law reads—you can’t work as an entertainer unless you are licensed to do so.