Mr. Oliver. No.
Mr. Jenner. Now, we will pass to page 18. There is a column headed “Three Explanations”. Do you find it?
Mr. Oliver. Right.
Mr. Jenner. It reads in part, “Why was Kennedy murdered by the young Bolshevik? With a little imagination it is easy to excogitate numerous explanations that are not absolutely impossible. For example, (a) Oswald was a madman who acted all alone just to get his name in the papers; (b) Oswald was a poor shot who was really trying to kill Governor Connally or Mrs. Kennedy, and hit the President by mistake; (c) the person killed was not Kennedy but a double and the real Kennedy is now a guest aboard a flying saucer, on which he is heroically negotiating with Martians or Saturnians to save The World, cap ‘T’ cap ‘W’. With a little time and a fairly wide reading in romantic fiction anyone can think of 60 or 70 fantasies as good or better than those that I have mentioned.”
And the next paragraph:
“On the evidence, however, and with the consideration of human probabilities there are only three explanations that are not preposterous, viz:”
To what did you refer when you used the reference “On the evidence.”?
Mr. Oliver. On the evidence that I had already stated.
Mr. Jenner. You mean that which you have stated here in the course of the testimony?
Mr. Oliver. Yes; and also stated in this article. That is, the evidence that has been stated; my testimony has related to the previous parts of this article.