Education of the Public

From the beginning to the end of an epidemic the health authorities, aided by the medical profession, should take the public wholly into their confidence. At the first news of the approach of the disease a general bulletin should be issued giving all of the main facts that are available. This was done in a way by the American Public Health Service, but the bulletin reached only a small fraction of the people, and although parts of it appeared later in the daily papers, it was pretty generally missed. The papers should be used freely and the space paid for when necessary, so that the news of the epidemic is featured emphatically. The establishment of a question and answer department or a bureau of information would take care of a great deal in the way of denying misinformation. The public should be encouraged to report helpful facts of all kinds, but with the understanding that no rumors would be published without investigation and confirmation. In this way it would be possible to prevent articles advising harmful and useless remedies from reaching the press, and aid in suppressing some of the “Sure Cures,” so many of which appeared to abuse the confidence of the unwary during the 1918 epidemic. Several such cures have been most interestingly discussed in a recent bulletin of the United States Public Health Service. The bulletin divides the “Sure Cures” into three different classes, as follows: “First comes the individual who has a specific remedy, the formula of which he will sell for a price * * *; next comes the person with a pseudo-scientific treatment, e. g., isotonic sea water, ‘orzono therapy,’ ‘harmonic vibrations.’ * * * Still another type, who gives freely of his advice that humanity may be spared from pestilence.” Among the latter are found advice for placing sulphur in the shoes, wearing of amulets, inhaling of alcohol, chloroform, etc., as well as numerous religious and mental science treatments, etc. A frank statement of facts and a discussion of the ridiculous side of many of these claims would undoubtedly benefit the entire public. The placarding of the cars and the warnings posted in conspicuous places no doubt helped greatly, and this method undoubtedly should be continued. As long as theatres are allowed to remain open, speakers may be used to advantage to emphasize important points. The County Medical Societies should be asked to appoint committees for supplying information or for seeing that the information given to the public is authoritative. In large cities committees may be organized among hospital superintendents, so that the heartiest co-operation between health authorities and hospitals will be available. The ever-ready aid of the Red Cross and of every other auxiliary body should be employed to the fullest extent to allay apprehension and relieve suffering.

Summary

The exact knowledge of the mode of transmission of epidemic influenza is still wanting, but it is known to be spread by contact. Attention should be directed toward every practical means of decreasing the number and intimacy of contacts. Publicity campaigns and other educational measures should be pushed strongly. Health Departments should adopt a policy of preparedness during inter-epidemic times, should make every effort to centralize and standardize their work, and should take steps to obtain sufficient legal backing, so that upon the appearance of the epidemic they can take the lead, speak with authority and enforce their ordinances and measures. The physician’s duty is to inform himself on the value of the various measures, and if he is at odds with the public health methods, he should settle them between epidemics, so that when he is called upon to carry out public health orders he can do it to the letter and without criticism. Laymen should learn that quiet living without violent exercise, the keeping of good hours, the avoidance of public gatherings and of unnecessary exposure is the best policy to pursue during influenza epidemics. They should strictly obey the orders of those who have specialized in the control of epidemics, and all business men must stand ready to help in every possible way and to make their business interests subservient to the public good.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.Rosenau, Keegan, Goldberger and LakePublic Health Report, 1919; xxxiv, No. 2, p. 33.
1a.McCoy and RicheyPublic Health Report, 1919; xxxiv, No. 2, p. 34.
2.LacyJour. Lab. and Clin. Med., 1918; iv, p. 55.
3.WollsteinJour. Exper. Med., 1911; xiv, p. 73.
4.FlexnerJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1913; lxi, p. 1872.
5.Park and WilliamsBacteriology, 1914 Edition; p. 437.
6.LearyJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 2098.
7.LearyAmer. Jour. Public Health, 1918; viii, p. 755.
8.RosenauPreliminary report furnished through Surgeon-General of the Navy W. C. Braisted.
9.BarnesJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 1849.
10.Hinton and KaneThe Commonwealth Mass. State Dept. Health, 1918; vi, Nos. 1 and 2, p. 28.
11.Hinton and KaneHinton’s Report.
12.ParkerJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 476.
13.PearceJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1913; lxi, p. 2115.
14.Committee on New and Non-Official RemediesJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxx, p. 1967.
15.McCoyPersonal Communication.
16.HutchinsonDixmont Hospital Report.
17.McCoy, Murray and TeeterJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 1997.
18.Minaker and IrvineJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 847.
19.ShermanReport.
20.MaberryReport from Hospital for Insane, Retreat, Pa.
21.RosenowJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 31.
22.Beaver, Boles and CaseJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 265.
23.Ely, Lloyd, Hitchcock and NicksonJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 24
24.KitanoJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 1575.
25.WynnPract. London, 1919; cii, p. 77.
26.Norman WhiteLancet., 1919; i, p. 707.
27.Whitingham and SimsLancet., 1918; ii, p. 865.
28.CadhamLancet., 1919; ii, p. 885.
29.Eyre and LoweLancet., 1918; ii, p. 485.
30.Conference British War Office
31.Whitmore, Fennel and PetersonJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxx, p. 427; also p. 902.
32.FennelJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 2115.
33.Dochez and GillespieJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1913; lxi, p. 727.
34.ListerPublications of the South African Institute for Medical Research, No. 2, 1913.
35.ListerPublications of the South African Institute for Medical Research, No. 8, 1916.
36.ListerPublications of the South African Institute for Medical Research, No. 10, 1917.
37.Cecil and AustinJour. Exper. Med., 1918; xxviii, p. 19.
37a.Cecil and VaughanJour. Exper. Med., 1919; xxix, p. 457.
38.BloomfieldJohns Hopkins Bull., 1919; xxx, p. 1.
39.CappsWar Med., Vol. ii, p. 371.
39a.CappsJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxx, p. 910.
40.WeaverJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxx, p. 76.
41.WeaverJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 1405.
42.WeaverJour. Infect. Dis., 1919; xxiv, p. 218.
43.Doust and LyonJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 1216.
44.Haller and ColwellJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 1213.
45.LeeteLancet., 1919; i, p. 392.
46.DannenbergJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxx, p. 99.
47.MinkJour. Amer. Med. Assoc. 1918; lxxi, p. 2175.
48.VaughanJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 2100.
49.CopelandJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 2173.
50.Lynch and CummingsJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1918; lxxi, p. 2174.
51.Amer. Med. AssociationPublic Health Report, 1919; xxxiv, p. 1413.
52.Le Moignie and PinoyCompt. rendu. Soc. Biol., 1916; lxxix, pp. 201 and 352.
52a.Wright and DouglasProc. Royal Soc. Med., 1904; lxxiii, p. 128, and lxxiv, p. 147.
53.Neufeld and RimpauZeitschr. f. Hyg., 1905; li, p. 283.
54.RosenauPrevent. Med. and Hyg., 1918.
55.Brown, Palfrey and HartJour. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1919; lxxii, p. 463.
56.GayTyphoid fever. (Published by Macmillan Co., 1918.)
57.Eyre and LowLancet. I, April 5, 1919; p. 557.

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL OBSERVATIONS IN EPIDEMIC INFLUENZA

By C. C. Guthrie, Ph. D., M. D.

The material consisted of cases in the acute stage of epidemic influenza with and without clinical pulmonary involvement (alveolar); of convalescents, and of normal individuals without influenzal history.

It was hoped that it would be possible to follow selected cases over considerable time periods, observation to compromise coordinated clinical as well as laboratory data, but the exigencies of the situation rendered this impossible. Unfortunately, this limits the value of the studies. But since similar observations were made on cases ranging from normal to the gravest severity—in fact, preceding death but a few hours in some instances—and from the nature of the findings, certain conclusions are clearly warranted.