The prevalence of B. influenzæ in various sections of this country may be indicated by the following reports chosen from many available ones. Keegan, from the First Naval District Hospital, found B. influenzæ 19 times from 23 in cultures grown from the lungs. In 6 cases these cultures were pure. Medalia reported from Camp McArthur the following. Out of 2,279 sputa of influenza suspects, 76.8 per cent. showed “B. influenzæ” in smears, and 445 sputa from cases of broncho-pneumonia showed it in 54 per cent. It was found in culture in only 10.6 per cent. of these last cases. He considered sputum smears of practical diagnostic help. He further grew B. influenzæ twice from the blood during life, once with a pneumococcus and once alone. Necropsy cultures gave B. influenzæ in 2 of 3 cultures from the brain, 19 of 34 from the heart, 19 of 36 from the spleen, 54 of 65 from both lungs, 50 of 62 from the right pleura and 47 of 62 from the left pleura. The percentage of positive results ranged from 53 in the spleen to 83 in the lungs. Nuzum and his associates only found B. influenzæ in 4 of 100 cases from the bronchial secretions, but it is interesting to note that he grew it in practically pure culture from both lungs of one case at autopsy. Synnott and Clark in Camp Dix found streptococci and pneumococci predominating, and, although making no particular effort to study the B. influenzæ or determine its frequency, they found it in the majority of cases when it was looked for. Blanton and Irons reported as follows from Camp Custer. From cultures of the nose and throat of 357 examined before the epidemic struck, B. influenzæ was found in 5.1 per cent.; in 366 throat cultures of influenza cases without physical signs of pneumonia the same organism was grown in 44, or 8 per cent.; sputa typed for pneumococci 740 times from influenza cases with pneumonia gave isolations of B. influenzæ 38 times, or 5 per cent.—8 times alone, but here it should be remarked that these latter isolations were only attempted after the organism was suspected from the morphological picture of the smears; from 280 autopsies B. influenzæ was recovered 8 times from the lung and 3 times from the heart’s blood. This report covered the period from the outbreak of the epidemic, October 5 (or as given by Soper, September 30) to October 22, at the outside a period of 22 days. During this time 366 throat cultures, 510 blood cultures, 740 sputa typed for pneumococci, 280 autopsies with cultures from both lung and heart’s blood, made a total of primary cultures of well over 2,000. The technical difficulties would make it almost impossible to handle such a mass of material and get reliable results for the incidence of B. influenzæ.
Brem, Bolling and Casper in Camp Fremont found B. influenzæ in 259 from 537 selected cases in swabs from the nasopharynx. It was also noted in a fair number of other examinations. Opie and his co-workers found B. influenzæ to be very frequent at Camp Pike. Spooner, Scott and Heath isolated B. influenzæ at Camp Devens from the sputa of 104 cases, from nasopharyngeal swabs in 11 out of 18 attempts and from the pleural fluid 8 times out of 45, twice pure. From 37 autopsies they found B. influenzæ in 23 and in pure culture in at least 1 lobe of the lung in 16. From 82 blood cultures at autopsy B. influenzæ was recovered twice. Nichols and Stimmel studied lung punctures during life and grew the B. influenzæ from 7 out of 10 attempts, 5 times in pure culture. Stone and Swift at Fort Riley found B. influenzæ in 18.7 per cent. of 928 sputa and in 5.2 per cent. of 77 sputa from fatal cases. He recovered it from autopsy material; 21 times from 51 lungs, once alone; twice from 26 pleural fluids; twice from 30 heart bloods; 19 times from the sinuses of 40, and 9 times from the ear and mastoid of 17 cases.
Lamb and Brannin at Camp Cody examined 80 typical cases early in the epidemic. They found B. influenzæ predominated in 46 per cent. being present with pneumococci on 41 per cent. of the plates. They also grew the influenza bacillus from a fair number of other cases.
Wollstein and Goldbloom in the Babies Hospital of the City of New York found the B. influenzæ in 13 of 17 sputa during life and in both lungs of all 18 autopsies as well as in the heart’s blood of one. Kotz found it in half of his 30 cases. Pritchett and Stillman grew the influenza bacillus from 41 of 49 cases of influenza, from 40 of 43 cases of influenza with broncho-pneumonia, from all of six other broncho-pneumonia cases and from 11 of 20 cases of lobar pneumonia, making a total of 98 positive findings from 118 or 82 per cent. They further found 25 positives from 54 convalescent and 74 from 177 normal sputa. Wolbach found this organism in pure culture in one or more lobes of the lungs of 9 from 23 cultured cases. It was demonstrated in 23 of 28 either by culture or in section.
Similar results are to be found in reports from Great Britain. Martin noted a great increase in the numbers present as the sputum became more purulent. Hicks and Gray found B. influenzæ by culture in 75 per cent. of their cases. They were seen in direct smears in only 70 per cent. Gotch and Wittingham considered M. catarrhalis to be the etiological factor as it was found in all of their 50 cases. B. influenzæ was grown in 8 per cent., although B. influenzæ-like bacilli, were seen in 62 per cent. of their smears. Averill, Young and Griffiths studied the sputum from 41 cases and found B. influenzæ in 32. It is interesting that Macdonald and Lyth determined the incubation period to be 41 hours as a minimum in their own experience and that from the posterior nares of one of them B. influenzæ was obtained.
Schofield and Cynn found the B. influenzæ in Korea. Kraus in Brazil found it in the sputum in 62 per cent. of his cases of influenza. It was also found in the organs of 27 who had died, being in pure culture in five. It has further been found in France, Italy and practically all parts of the world where investigations have been made. The German literature is at present only available in the report of the British Medical Research Committee which is written in a more or less popular manner with a rather strong tendency against the importance of B. influenzæ. Dietrich, Simmonds, Bergmann and others, however, found B. influenzæ rather frequently. Such quotations as “Uhlenhuth, a diehard of bacteriologic orthodoxy, has clearly shown signs of uneasiness” and “one empyema and one throat swab yielded the looked for growth” will indicate why this review is of little use. It is certainly necessary to “look for” the B. influenzæ to get results of any worth.
Secondary, ancillary or symbiotic bacteria are of cardinal importance in these infections. It has been considered by some writers as characteristic for the influenza bacillus to be followed so frequently with such a variety of secondary invaders. Sahli looked upon the complex of B. influenzæ, pneumococcus and streptococcus as the true etiological cause of influenza. Abrahams and his associates discussed the symbiotic effect of the B. influenzæ in raising the virulence of pneumococci previously present in the patient and many other investigators lay stress on these symbiotic relationships.
Pneumococci appear to be the commonest of these secondary micro-organisms judging from the various published reports, but the fact must not be overlooked that, particularly in America, the typing of pneumococci has drawn a disproportionate attention to this group. Hemolytic streptococci have received much attention (Ely and his co-workers and several others). M. catarrhalis (Gotch and Wittingham and several of the British writers), members of the B. mucosus capsulatus group (Nichols and Stimmel, Rucker and Wenner), staphylococcus aureus (Patrick), various ill-defined streptococci (Rosenow and several British writers), capsulated cocci apparently different from pneumococci, B. pestislike forms and many others have been given more or less attention, often as clearly recognized secondary infections, but not infrequently as of primary significance.
B. influenzæ, however, is the organism most regularly found in this pandemic where carefully looked for, and the evidence of its lowering the general resistance to bacterial invasion is very strong. The experiments of Ghedini and Fedeli showing the effect of the toxine on muscular tone and those of Ghedini and Breccia who found a similar effect on blood vessels are worthy of note.
The fact that the flora differs so widely in various regions is what one might expect and many investigators have emphasized the significance of this. Bacteria in the mouth and throat are readily transmitted from individual to individual and under the conditions in the training camps and our modern life, the development of local flora is not surprising. That it is of very great importance is recognized by all and it is often a determining factor in the severity of the infection. Nevertheless, influenza in this pandemic has been almost equally severe whatever the secondary organism may have been.