Strike unless plaintiff is discharged, as a means toward better conditions in the shop, see Minasian v. Osborne, 210 Mass. 250.

Strike to get rid of personally objectionable foreman. De Minico v. Craig, 207 Mass. 593.

[620]. Statement abridged. Portions of opinion omitted.

[621]. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S. 418; Baldwin v. Escanaba Dealers’ Ass’n, 165 Mich. 98; Fink v. Butchers’ Union, 84 N. J. Eq. 638; McCormick v. Local Unions, 32 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 165 Accord.

Compare Ex parte Heffron, 179 Mo. App. 639.

[622]. Bossert v. Dhuy, 221 N. Y. 342; Cohn & Roth Electric Co. v. Bricklayers’ Union, 92 Conn. 161 Accord. See Iron Molders’ Union v. Allis Chalmers Co., (C. C. A.) 166 Fed. 45. Also Wigmore, The Boycott as Ground for Damages, 21 American Law Rev. 509, and Interference with Social Relations, 21 American Law Rev. 764.

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES

  1. P. [403], changed “Holden v. McGillicuddy, 213 Mass. 563” to “Holden v. McGillicuddy, 215 Mass. 563”.
  2. P. [552], changed “they avoid the contract” to “they void the contract”.
  3. P. [840], changed “by continued user in connection” to “by continued use in connection”.
  4. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and variations in spelling.
  5. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings as printed.
  6. Re-indexed footnotes using numbers and collected together at the end of the last chapter.