HISTORY.—The terms scarlet fever and scarlatina are used synonymously to designate one of the most common and fatal of the eruptive fevers. Whether this malady occurred prior to the Christian era is uncertain. It is believed by some that the plague of Athens, 430 years before Christ, vividly described by Lucretius, and by Thucydides, who was attacked by it, was scarlet fever of a peculiarly malignant type (Richardson); but, as will be seen from the following extracts from Thucydides, the plague differed in important particulars from scarlatina of the present time: "Internally, the throat and the tongue were quickly suffused with blood, and the breath became unnatural and fetid. There followed sneezing and hoarseness; in a short time the disorder, accompanied by a violent cough, reached the chest.... The body externally was not so very hot to the touch, nor yet pale: it was of a livid color, inclining to red, and breaking out in pustules and ulcers." Loss of sight and gangrene of the extremities were common results in those who recovered, and adults appear to have been affected as frequently as children. "The dead lay as they had died, one upon another, while others, hardly alive, wallowed in the streets and crawled about every fountain craving for water. The temples in which they lodged were full of the corpses of those who died in them." Lucretius says of this plague, "If any one for a time escaped death (as was possible, either by reason of the foul ulcers breaking or by means of a black discharge from the intestines), yet consumption and destruction awaited him at last; or, as was often the case, an excessive flux of corrupt blood, attended with violent pains in the head, issued from the obstructed nostrils, and by this outlet the whole strength and substance of the man passed away. He, moreover, who had escaped this violent flux of foul blood was not certain wholly to recover, for still the disease was ready to pass into his nerves and joints, and into the very genital organs of the body. And of those who suffered thus, some, fearing the gates of death, continued to live, though deprived by the steel of the virile part, and some, though without hands and feet, and though they lost their eyes, yet persisted to remain in life, so strong a dread of death had taken possession of them. Upon some, too, came forgetfulness of all things, so that they knew not even themselves."
Gangrene of the extremities, loss of sight, a violent cough, loss of memory, etc. are not symptoms of scarlet fever, so that in my opinion the plague of Athens, if correctly described by the historian, was a different malady.
Caspar Morris, in his essay on scarlet fever, states his belief that Seneca, who lived in the first century of the Christian era, described an epidemic of the malignant form of scarlatina in his portrayal of the pestilence that visited Thebes during the half-mythical age of Oedipus, six centuries before Christ. Seneca's description of the symptoms of this plague is as follows:
|
Piger ignavos Alligat artus languor, et ægro Rubor in vultu, maculæque caput Sparsere leves; tum vapor ipsam Corporis arcem flammeus urit Multoque genus sanguine tendit Oculique regent, et sacer ignis Pascitur artus. Resonant aures, Stillatque niger naris aducæ Cruor; at venas rumpit hiantes. |
Languor, redness of the face, light spots upon the head, distension of the cheeks with blood, distortion of the eyes, a flushed appearance of the limbs, tinnitus aurium, and a discharge of black blood from the nostrils, certainly indicated a very malignant form of disease, but to believe that it was identical with the scarlet fever of the present time requires considerable credulity. From the fact that it devastated Thebes we infer that it occurred largely among adults, differing, therefore, from the modern scarlet fever, whose victims are chiefly children. The same uncertainty hangs over epidemics during the first centuries of the Christian era.
The first clear and undoubted portrayal of scarlet fever is found in the medical literature of the sixteenth century. Sydenham and his contemporaries in the seventeenth century witnessed epidemics of it, studied its nature more thoroughly, and consequently acquired a more accurate knowledge of it than that possessed by their predecessors. It was in this century that measles and scarlet fever were differentiated. During the last two hundred years scarlatina has been the subject of monographs too numerous to mention. It has long been regarded as one of the most important maladies of childhood, on account of its frequency and the great mortality that attends it, so that numerous cases and many epidemics are every year related in the medical journals. By this vast accumulation of observations and the patient and thorough use of the microscope our knowledge of scarlet fever has become full and accurate.
As with most of the infectious maladies, scarlet fever extended to the Western World through European shipping. It was brought to North America about the year 1735. Tardily it spread to South America, where it appeared in 1829, and more recently it has been established in Australia. It entered Iceland in 1827, and Greenland in 1847.
ETIOLOGY.—The evidence is strong that scarlet fever does not originate de novo—that it does not spring from certain atmospheric or telluric conditions, but is produced by a definite specific principle, since countries have been free from it for centuries till it was imported by commerce. That it appears in certain localities without any known exposure is attributed to the fact that the poison is so subtle and transmissible that it is conveyed long distances in articles of merchandise, even in small packages, so that those who chance to open them or come in contact with them are infected. It is believed that reading matter transmitted through the mails has in many instances been the medium of infection.
The theory that the acute infectious maladies are caused by micro-organisms, or, as they are now designated, microbes, commonly discarded at first and believed to be chimerical, is rapidly gaining ground in the profession, and appears to be fully established as regards certain of them. These parasites, barely visible under high powers of the microscope, and ascertained to be vegetable by their behavior under certain chemical agents, exist in immense numbers in the blood, tissues, and secretions of patients suffering from the infectious maladies, especially in the graver cases of them; and the microscope shows that these organisms vary in shape and appearance so as to admit of classification.