EPIDEMIC CEREBRO-SPINAL MENINGITIS.
BY ALFRED STILLÉ, M.D., LL.D.
DEFINITION.—A febrile, and often malignant, but non-contagious disease of unknown origin; usually occurring as a local epidemic; confined hitherto to the North American and European continents, and to the vicinity of the latter; characterized by its rapid and irregular course, and usually by a tetanic rigidity or retraction of the neck, a tendency to disorganization of the blood, and the formation of inflammatory exudates beneath the membranes of the brain and spinal cord.
SYNONYMS.—Spotted fever; petechial fever; malignant purpuric fever; malignant purpura; pestilential purpura; black death; typhus petechialis; typhus syncopalis; febris nigra; febbre soporoso-convulsivo; tifo apoplettico tetanico; fièvre cérébro-spinale; typhus cérébro-spinale; phrenitis typhodes; epidemic meningitis; epidemic cerebro-spinal meningitis; malignant meningitis; typhoid meningitis; méningite cérébro-spinale épidémique; méningite cérébro-rachidienne; Genickkrampf; Genickstarre.
The names which have been given to this disease convey more or less distinctly one or the other of two ideas: 1st, that the disease is essentially a blood-disorder; and 2d, that it is an inflammation of the cerebro-spinal meninges. Under the first head belong the following names: Malignant purpuric fever; malignant purpura; pestilential purpura; petechial fever; spotted fever; febris nigra; black death, etc. Under the second head belong epidemic cerebro-spinal meningitis; epidemic meningitis; malignant meningitis; typhoid meningitis, etc. As partaking of the qualities of both categories may be cited the names cerebro-spinal fever and fever with cerebro-spinal meningitis. In regard to all those of the first class it is sufficient to repeat the criticism made by the early American writers who described this disease after having largely studied it. One only of them need be cited, because he expresses the opinion of all. Miner, writing in 1822, said: "It is quite unfortunate that a single symptom (petechiæ), and one, too, that is wanting in a great majority of cases, should have been seized upon to give it the odious and deceptive name of spotted fever, as that name has been applied by European writers to a very different kind of fever." Among the names given to the disease, cerebro-spinal fever is perhaps the least suitable and the least in harmony with the principles of scientific nomenclature. It is one of those terms which may be pardoned when used by the laity, but which educated physicians ought not tolerate. Parallel examples may be found in such compounds as brain-fever, lung-fever, gastric-fever, and, most unfortunate of all, enteric fever. The first three of these are inflammations, pure and simple, of the brain, lung, and stomach; and, after their example, cerebro-spinal meningitis would be, what it is not, merely an inflammation of the membranes of the brain and spinal marrow. The name of the remaining disease has only to be turned into English and called intestinal fever to demonstrate its defects. It is evident that other diseases—and dysentery in particular—are equally entitled to be called enteric fever. Moreover, there are cases of enteric fever in which death takes place so early that the intestinal lesion is undeveloped, and the fatal issue must be attributed to the fever-poison in the blood or else to the changes it has wrought in that fluid. Analogous illustrations abound in the history of the eruptive fevers. The disease we are studying presents another affection in which the septic element sometimes so far overrides the inflammatory as to destroy life before the latter has developed characteristic tissue-changes. There may be no valid objection against classing it among the fevers, but there can be no excuse for denominating it cerebro-spinal fever. The very reasons that militate against its being regarded as a meningitis forbid its being considered as a meningeal fever. But if it is a meningitis, inchoate or complete, then the prefix epidemic denotes its constitutional nature and its probable blood origin, and a term is employed which is descriptive and accurate, and not misleading. Moreover, the term epidemic indicates, or at least implies, the characteristic type of the disease, which is asthenic and sometimes more or less typhoidal, just as other inflammatory diseases become so in their epidemic form—e.g. pneumonia, bronchitis (influenza), dysentery, etc.
There ought to be no doubt whether epidemic meningitis should be classed with general diseases or with inflammations. It is excluded from the latter class by the total absence of any tangible external cause from its causation, as well as by its frequent fatal termination before the characteristic signs of inflammation have had time to form, or because the peculiar type of the disease prevents their development. It belongs to the former class because it is epidemic in the largest sense, its outbreaks occurring simultaneously in remote parts of the earth and independently of all cognizable celestial or terrestrial influences. In this as in other elements of its pathology the disease stands absolutely alone. While the acute affections of the pulmonary and digestive organs, which were just now alluded to, affect large districts, and even sweep over a whole continent, epidemic meningitis breaks out in limited localities, and may for years prevail in a populous city within a hundred miles of another still more populous which during that time may altogether escape its ravages. Of this curious fact the cities of Philadelphia and New York present a striking illustration. Since, then, we are ignorant of the circumstances under which the disease arises, and since, as will more distinctly appear later on, its several forms really include quite various morbid conditions, we are compelled to consider it as occupying a peculiar and exceptional nosological position.
HISTORY.—Previous to the present century the existence of this disease can hardly be demonstrated. And yet Dr. B. W. Richardson believed that some faint traces of it could be discovered, as in the following statement:1 "The great plague which visited Constantinople in 543, and which Procopius and Enagrius described, the plague of hallucination, drowsiness, slumbering, distraction, and ardent fever, with eruption on the skin of black pimples the size of a lentil,—this plague, which usually killed in five days, and left many who recovered with withered limbs, wasted tongues, stammering speech or such utterance of sound that their words could not be distinguished,—this plague, which had passed into mythical learning under the name of cerebro-spinal meningitis, has also in our time reappeared." The concluding statement in regard to the name of the plague is quite erroneous, and there is nothing in the description which distinctively applies to the disease we are examining. On the other hand, we know that Procopius wrote a history of the Oriental plague, which invaded Europe for the first time at the very date above given. It had as a distinctive symptom the well-known inguinal bubo, and there is no mention whatever, in the descriptions of it that have survived, of the tetanoid symptoms belonging to epidemic meningitis. In 1802 an epidemic occurred at Roetlingen in Franconia which had a certain resemblance to the subject of this article, for it was characterized by lacerating pains in the back of the neck. According to Hecker, this was the sweating sickness which had ravaged various parts of Europe during the Middle Ages, and of which limited outbreaks still recur. In 1880 such a one took place at l'Ile d'Oléron in France, and many of the patients were affected with tonic or clonic spasms, both general and local, but not, apparently, opisthotonic.2
1 Diseases of Modern Life, p. 16.