Epidemic catarrhal fever is, with its Latin equivalent, the most satisfactory of the so-called scientific names by which the disease is at present known.
In the popular names for the affection there is to be noted an indication of the national character of some of the peoples who have suffered from its frequent visitations.
Among the English it is known as cold or epidemic cold, or, in deference to medical authority, as catarrh or epidemic catarrh; and at present, both among the folk and the doctors, as influenza. Englishmen are neither quick to see in the disease a resemblance to some common circumstance or thing, nor are they disposed to make a joke about it.
The Germans find obvious resemblances. In the labored respiration and the character of the cough they find a suggestion of a common epizoötic affecting the sheep, hence Schaffhusten and Shaffkrankheit; or, because the cough is like the crowing of a cock and the disturbance of respiration and rapid prostration suggest some resemblance to a common disease of the domestic fowl, it has been called Huhner-Weh (chicken disease, whooping cough), and Ziep, which is about equivalent to pip. They call it also, from its rapid invasion, Blitz-Katarrh, and from its diffusion, Mödefieber.
The French are disposed to make a jest of everything, and the more serious the subject the better the joke. Hence they have found a new name for almost every great epidemic, and each more trivial than the last. Thus, tac (rot); horion (in jest, a blow); quinte, because the spells occur at intervals of five hours (sic); coqueluche (a hood or cowl), from the cap worn by those suffering from the malady; and so on through the long list given above.
La grippe is said to be derived from the Polish Chrypka (Raucedo); it may, however, be derived from agripper (to seize).
Influenza is of Italian derivation. It is said that the disease received this name because it was attributed to the influence of the stars, or from a secondary signification of the word indicating something fluid, transient, or fashionable.
HISTORICAL SKETCH.1—Epidemics of influenza have been clearly recorded only since the beginning of the sixteenth century. There are numerous accounts of earlier epidemic diseases resembling it, but they are not sufficiently particular to warrant us in inferring its undoubted existence. It is supposed to be referred to in the writings of Hippocrates, who, however, gives no exact description.2 An outbreak in the Athenian army in Sicily (415 B.C.), recorded by Diodorus Siculus, has been supposed to have been influenza. Despite these statements, and those of others to the effect that it is a disease known from a remote antiquity, it may be said that no accounts can be confidently established, as referring to the disease now known as influenza, in the writings of classical antiquity.3
1 See also The Continued Fevers, by the author of this paper, New York, 1881.
2 Parkes, Reynolds's System of Medicine, vol. i., 1868.