It is to be differentiated from non-specific catarrhal affections attended by fever, malaise, weakness, severe headache, and pain in the extremities by a due regard to the causative relations of the two affections. Simple catarrhs not rarely present the group of symptoms which characterize epidemic catarrhal fever, but they occur almost constantly as the result of great and sudden changes in the weather, and are therefore met with in greatest frequency in bad seasons, and are particularly common at the end of winter and in the spring. Influenza is not in any way dependent upon the vicissitudes of the seasons, and may occur, as has been shown, at all times of the year, in wet or dry, mild or cold seasons equally, and in every variety of climate. It is of course diagnosticated without difficulty from the sporadic catarrhal fevers, which lack the characteristic depression, neuralgic and rheumatoid pains, the irritative cough, dyspnoea, and so on.

Cases of influenza are met with that bear a strong resemblance to beginning enteric fever. The malaise, headache, obtunded hearing, mental depression, high fever, coated tongue, tender belly, diarrhoea, are symptoms to be observed in both affections. But influenza lacks the temperature curve, the splenic enlargement, and the eruption of enteric fever, and the progress of the disease will in a few days clear up the most doubtful case.

PROGNOSIS AND MORTALITY.—Death is rare in uncomplicated cases. The very young bear influenza badly; the old bear it more badly still. Nevertheless, children have in some epidemics enjoyed a considerable proportionate immunity. Healthy persons in the middle periods of life bear it well. Certain pre-existing diseases modify its course unfavorably; among these are chronic bronchitis, emphysema, fatty heart, and Bright's disease. The debility of advanced phthisis and other exhausting diseases renders influenza dangerous. Death takes place, in by far the greater number of cases, as the result of the complication of the attack, either by some pre-existing affection or by an acute disease arising in its course. The commonest of the latter are inflammations of the parenchyma of the lungs.

Patients presenting very severe symptoms generally recover if they be not the subjects of complicating maladies or very young or very old.

Relapses are not uncommon; independently of relapses, second attacks have been known to occur during the continuance of an epidemic; it is often the case that an individual in the course of his life passes through several epidemics of influenza, and is the subject of the disease in each of them.

The prognosis is greatly modified by the character of the prevailing epidemic. In some epidemics the deaths are few, and the mortality from other diseases does not appear to be greatly augmented. In others many die of the epidemic disease, and the death-rate of certain endemic affections is much increased. In some of the older epidemics the high mortality was doubtless due to injudicious measures of treatment, among which bloodletting and other depressing agencies were conspicuous. Some of the older accounts also warrant the suspicion that a coexisting typhus had to do with the high death-rate. It is estimated that in the epidemic of 1837, which was a very severe one, 2 per cent. of those attacked died. The proportion of fatal cases in particular epidemics varies in different countries, and even in different quarters of the same city.

TREATMENT.—Efficient measures of prophylaxis are as yet unknown. Unfavorable hygienic surroundings, overcrowding, a damp, unhealthy locality, appear to increase the prevalence and severity of influenza. The opposite conditions of living do not, however, secure immunity from the attack. During an epidemic aged persons, those enfeebled by chronic diseases, and in particular those subject to chronic bronchitis, consumption, emphysema, fatty heart, and Bright's disease should be cared for with unusual diligence and solicitude, since they constitute the classes most prone to the graver complications of the disease, and from which its fatal cases are almost wholly derived. Such individuals should be warmly clad; they should shun, so far as possible, the vicissitudes of the weather, even, if practicable, keeping within warmed and well-ventilated apartments; they should exercise unusual prudence in diet and lead a carefully regulated life, with long hours of sleep. It is true that these measures are not preventive of the attack. Families not quitting the house, living in the greatest seclusion, even the bedridden, do not always, or even as a rule, escape. Yet it has frequently been observed that those whose occupations are carried on in the open air are attacked earliest and in greatest numbers. On the other hand, in rare instances, persons isolated from the community with strictness—in prisons, cloisters, hospitals—have remained free from the disease prevailing around them. It therefore appears probable that, under certain favorable circumstances not as yet perfectly understood, the avoidance of the open air and of the direct influences of the weather may confer some degree of immunity from the attack, and it is desirable that the class of persons most liable to the graver consequences of the disease should avail themselves of even the most uncertain precautions.

The treatment of influenza is expectant and supporting. Not only is the epidemic self-limiting, tending to exhaust the susceptibility of a community, in most instances, in the space of a few weeks, but the attack is also of definite duration, and the perturbations set up by the action of the influenza-poison upon the individual subside spontaneously in three or four, or at most ten or twelve, days. The susceptibility of the individual is also, for the time being, exhausted, for second attacks in the same epidemic are not very common. In cases where the duration of the attack is prolonged beyond the period indicated, it is kept up by complications, and we have to do not so much with the pathological processes of influenza as with secondary diseases that the influenza has excited either by the intensity of its action or by reason of some peculiarity of the subject of the attack.

By far the greatest number of cases are light and unattended by danger. The treatment is therefore, for the most part, an extremely simple one. These lighter cases seldom require medical measures. The patients are uncomfortable and anxious, easily fatigued, and unfitted for business. It is best that they keep the house, and, if willing, the bed or sofa, for the space of two or three days. The diet should be restricted to a few simple and easily-digested dishes. Meat should be avoided. The common custom of taking hot beef-tea is an extremely bad one; it often increases the headache and languor. Moderate quantities of cold drinks may be taken. The fruit-syrups, lemonade, raspberry vinegar, a weak solution of citrate of potash or of cream of tartar, and barley-water with lemon, are useful. Very weak wine-whey is often liked. The effervescing mineral waters or Apollinaris are preferred by many persons. The best of such drinks is a mixture of equal parts of Seltzer-water and milk, iced. If the stomach be irritable, koumiss will be found an excellent beverage and food. In the mild cases stimulants are not necessary. Sound claret, with or without Seltzer-water, is not contraindicated. In all cases the amount of fluid taken should be moderate.

Quinine in moderate doses should be taken from the onset. The head-pains are not increased by it. Dover's powder, if well borne, should be administered at night. Some form of opiate may be required, even in mild cases, to counteract wakefulness. A compressed pill, containing extract of opium 0.030 gramme (gr. ½), camphor 0.15 (gr. ij), and ammonium carbonate 0.15 (gr. ij), will be found useful when Dover's powder cannot be employed. During convalescence iron and barks are often requisite.