TREATMENT.—Bloodletting and laxatives have been largely used in the treatment of anthrax, though both are mostly useless in acute cases, their possible good effects being anticipated by the early death. When of service at all, it is probably mainly in reducing that plethora which serves often to enhance the virulence and severity of the malady. Apart from these, the agents resorted to are more or less of an antiseptic nature, and probably exert their action mainly on the bacilli undergoing development near the surface of the skin or intestinal mucous membrane. In extensive outbreaks I have had the best results with the administration thrice daily of carbolic acid, nitro-muriatic acid, or bichromate of potassium, and hypodermically of iodide of potassium and sulphate of quinia. Alcoholic stimulants, chlorate of potassium, and muriate of iron are equally indicated, especially when the period of prostration has set in. If the local anthrax can be detected when there is as yet but a hard nodule, there should be no hesitation in cauterizing it to its depth and treating the resulting sore and surrounding parts with tincture of iodine or iodized phenol. After crucial incision the nodule may be treated with powerful caustics (potassa, nitric acid, chloride of zinc), to be followed by iodized phenol, with or without poultices or fomentations.
Anthrax in Man (Malignant Pustule or Vesicle, Anthrax Intestinalis, Mycosis Intestinalis).
Fournier in 1769 first traced the communicated anthrax of man to the consumption of the flesh of diseased animals and the handling of their wool. Until quite recently, however, the form which originated as a local external affection was the only type recognized, while internal anthrax was confounded with a multitude of other affections.
ETIOLOGY.—That anthrax in man is almost invariably derived from the lower animals by infection is now undoubted, while for the direct infection of man, as of animals, by the germs propagated in the soil, there is no absolute proof. The latter mode of propagation has only been recognized in the Herbivora, which are so much more exposed to contamination from the soil; yet, abstractly, there is no reason to suppose that man is less susceptible to the earth-grown bacillus than to that produced in the animal, if only he were as frequently exposed to its infection. The spontaneous development of anthrax apart from the pre-existent bacillus in animals or soil is a chimera. The principal modes of infection may be considered as direct and mediate. Among the direct are included infection from handling the sick animals, their carcases, their wool, hair, bristles, hides, fat, and guts; the inoculation of physicians, surgeons, and nurses from their patients; and the infection of men by the meat, milk, and cheese eaten. As attested modes of mediate infection may be cited the inoculation by insects (mosquitoes, bluebottles, and other bloodsuckers), and the introduction by water into which anthrax products have drained or been washed; there are also hypothetical cases in which anthrax-germs from the earth have entered the system in the air, drink, or food (raw vegetables). The direct inoculations are especially common in certain classes (shepherds, farmers, butchers, knackers, tanners, veterinarians, and workers in hides, hoofs, glue-factories, fat-rendering works, in hair, wool, bristles, and catgut, and in felting and paper-making). In such cases the disease usually begins as a local one, and occurs on uncovered portions of the body. Three such cases occurred in 1875 on one farm at Avon, N.Y., where the victims had assisted in burying forty dead cattle, and a number of other similar instances can be adduced in different parts of the same State, in one of which a physician was accidentally inoculated in dressing a farmer's hand. Physicians whose practice includes large tanneries become very familiar with the disease and recognize it very readily.
Infection through food is much less frequent in men than in animals, the process of cooking combining with the action of the gastric juice in destroying the poison. Yet it is by no means unknown. The records above given of infection in St. Domingo, Naples, and the Russian steppes can be easily supplemented. Dr. Keith of Aberdeen, Scotland, records the case of a family that suffered, two of them fatally, after partaking of broth and meat which had been boiled for hours, one member of the family (a vegetarian) having alone escaped. Infection through milk, butter, and cheese is less common, the gravity of the disease in animals leading to an early suppression of the mammary secretion. In all such cases the infection enters through sores in the mouth or from the bowels.
Those cases in which the bacillus enters the system with the inspired air are probably the least numerous. Yet the germ may reach the lungs in fine dust, and then find in the delicate respiratory mucous membrane the most accessible of all channels into the system.
The proportion of men affected is much greater than that of women and children, doubtless by reason of their greater exposure to infection, and, as in the lower animals, the summer months are most productive of anthrax. The susceptibility of the human race appears to be less than that of the Herbivora, and doubtless varies, as in these animals, with the nature of the food. It is at least temporarily exhausted by a first attack, though in exceptional cases and under a strong dose of the poison a man may be affected a second time.
SYMPTOMS.—Symptoms usually set in within twenty-four hours after inoculation of the poison, though it is alleged that the incubation may be extended to twelve or fourteen days. Itching draws attention to a small red spot like a mosquito bite, but with a black central point. This speedily increases to a small rounded swelling (papule), and in fifteen hours is surmounted by a minute vesicle with dark-red or bluish contents. From the size of a millet-seed this increases to that of a pea, and in thirty hours bursts spontaneously or under friction and forms a dark-red, indurated, comparatively painless nodule (parent nucleus, Virchow). The adjacent skin shows a swollen areola livid and red, on which there appear vesicles similar to the first, which pass through the same stages, burst, and leave a livid, hard, or doughy gangrenous surface. By this time the surrounding skin is red, shining, and puffy, and the disease continues to spread by the same method of extension. The diseased part now becomes the centre of an oedematous swelling which may invade the entire arm, face, or neck, and is attended with more or less constitutional symptoms. The affected part may be cold or hot, and it may show the red lines of lymphangitis and the swelling of the adjacent lymphatic glands.
The pyrexia, at first slight, often reaches a high grade, attended with occasional chilliness, pains in the back and loins, great prostration, languor, dulness, and even delirium, with cold sweats, anxiety, dyspnoea, and at times muscular spasms. As in beasts, there are the dusky skin and mucous membranes, petechiæ, and cyanosis, and in bad cases there may be sudden collapse and death. The symptoms vary much, however, according to the extent of the local lesion, to the amount of poisonous chemical products thrown into the blood, to the degree of the invasion of the blood by the bacillus, and to the complication (not infrequent) of the affection with septicæmia. In the very mildest cases the affection never proceeds beyond a local slough, the size of a quarter or half dollar, the germs do not enter the blood in sufficient numbers to survive, the constitutional symptoms are few or absent, and the sore heals by granulation.