Lister began the antiseptic treatment of compound fractures in 1865, although he did not publish his report until 1867. The cotton-wadding treatment of wounds, which is based on the fact that the air passed through cotton is freed by it from all germs, was first employed by Alphonse Guérin, who refers to it in the following language: "In the latter part of 1870 I had the idea that the cause of purulent infection existed in the germs or ferments which Pasteur had discovered in the air. It was at the end of the war; all the cases of amputation had succumbed to the purulent infection, and not a single large wound escaped the scourge. The studies which I had made from the month of September to the end of December in 1870 had confirmed me in the opinion that purulent infection is neither due to phlebitis nor to the absorption of pus. I believed more firmly than ever that the miasms emanating from the pus of the wounds were the real cause of this frightful malady to which I had been compelled to see the wounded succumb, whether they were treated with charpie or cerate, whether with the lotions of alcohol or of carbolic acid applied several times a day, and which was soaked up by the linen which remained in contact with the wounds. But this miasmatic theory remained, nevertheless, useless, since from 1847, when I professed it, the cases of amputation in my service succumbed to purulent infection in about the same proportion as those who were cared for by my partisan colleagues did from the absorption of pus or the inflammation of the veins. In my despair, seeking constantly a means to prevent this terrible complication of wounds, I had thought of the miasm of which I had admitted the existence, because I was not otherwise able to explain the production of the purulent infection, and which was not only known to me by its deleterious influence, but which appeared to consist of living corpuscles of the nature of those that Pasteur had seen in the air; and then the history of the miasmatic poison possessed for me a new clearness. So, said I then, the miasms are the ferments. I am able to protect the wounded against their fatal influence by filtering the air, as Pasteur had done, while maintaining, in opposition to Pouchet of Rouen, that there is no spontaneous generation. I thought then of the cotton-wadding treatment, and had the satisfaction of seeing my anticipation realized. It was from this time that dates in reality the theory of germs or of ferments as a cause of purulent infection."15
15 Nouveau Dictionnaire de Médicine et de Chirurgie pratiques, t. xxx. p. 265.
A series of important experiments were made in 1872 by Coze and Feltz, which consisted in injecting into the jugular vein and the subcutaneous cellular tissue putrid liquids; and they record, among other interesting results observed by them, that the blood of the animal thus destroyed always contained infusoria. These experiments have been repeated and their results confirmed by several observers, and in particular by Davine in 1872.
Another series of experiments were made by Behier and Lionville, which absolutely confirmed those of Coze and Feltz; they likewise found in the blood rounded and rod-shaped corpuscles possessed of movements more or less energetic. Vulpian also confirmed the results obtained by Davine and Behier. He says: "It will not do to deny to the immovable or movable vibriones and corpuscles found by Coze, Behier, and Davine a very important rôle, because they are not the essential contagion of the poisonous blood; it is at least necessary that they should be there in order to produce the alterations which have occurred in this fluid." Chauveau has experimented extensively, and likewise admits the action of the septic vibriones of Pasteur.
Pasteur has made known the result of his investigation in communications to the Academy of Medicine in 1877, 1878, and 1879. There exist, according to him, two principal vibriones—the pyogenic, or the producer of pus, and the septic, the producer of the properly so-called septicæmia. But the latter is not a unique disease, and, as we have seen from the outset, there are confounded under this name different states, light or grave, corresponding with as many forms of vibriones.
The questions of greatest practical importance in regard to this whole group of diseases seem to us to be, as expressed by Dr. Budd, where and how the specific poisons which cause them breed and multiply; and all who have closely followed the scientific investigations bearing on these points which Prof. Tyndall has conducted during the past few years, and who have repeated even a portion of his experiments, cannot fail to be powerfully impressed with the value of the views which he embodied in his work entitled Floating Matter of the Air.
NOMENCLATURE.—The want of a systematic classification of the various morbid conditions arising from septic infection has long embarrassed alike authors and students, and even at the present time the vague manner in which the terms pyæmia and septicæmia are used leads to much confusion. The Pathological Society of London appointed, in 1869, a committee to investigate the nature and causes of those infectious diseases known as pyæmia, septicæmia, and purulent infection. This committee, having spent ten years in the study of these affections in connection with nearly all the large hospitals of London, report the following: "Summary.—It would seem, from a careful study of all the cases here collected, that it is probable that the diseases commonly known clinically as pyæmia and septicæmia may be grouped as follows: 1. Septic intoxication.—The effects of poisoning by the chemical products of putrefaction. A non-infective disease. 2. Septic infection.—A general infective process arising from the introduction of some peculiar constituent of putrid matter into the blood-stream. It is supposed by some to be due to the multiplication of living organisms in the blood, and by others to the effect of a non-organized ferment. It terminates fatally without secondary inflammations. 3. Pyæmia (for want of a better name).—An infective process probably, similar in nature to septic infection, but differing from it by giving rise to local inflammation and suppurations, often complicated by thrombosis and embolism, probably due to the blood condition. 4. Thrombosis with softening and decomposition of the thrombus and embolism, causing local abscesses in the viscera wherever the septic emboli lodge, but without the development of any general infective process. 5. Various combinations of one or more of the foregoing conditions in the same subject. 6. Infective periostitis or acute necrosis. 7. Infective endocarditis or ulcerative endocarditis. 8. Infective myositis. 9. A group of obscure cases in which it is impossible to form any idea as to the exact nature, often called spontaneous septicæmia or pyæmia."16
16 Trans. Pathological Soc. of London, vol. xxx. p. 38.
It will be observed that the earlier writers on medicine, although aware of the existence of septic diseases, wholly failed to discriminate between pyæmia and septicæmia until 1848, and even since that date these terms have been only partially adopted by authors, by whom frequently the meaning of the same word has been so modified as to refer to essentially different conditions. Custom having fully sanctioned the use of these terms, it is now thought that a separate consideration of their nomenclature may be advantageous, and consequently we shall pursue this course.
NOMENCLATURE OF PYÆMIA.—In Dunglison's Medical Dictionary the definition given to pyæmia is, "Pyohæmia," and the latter word is defined as follows: "Pyohæmia, Pyæmia, Pyohémie (F.), from pyo, and [Greek: haema], 'blood;' alteration of the blood by pus, giving occasion to the diathesis seu infectio purulentia."