Bumstead18 and Taylor say that without mercurial treatment the danger of transmitting the disease to offspring usually persists up to the fourth year of syphilitic contagion.
18 Venereal Diseases, 1879, p. 739.
Mr. Lane says:19 "It is certainly the rule that when the parents have fully reached the tertiary stage the children born to them are free from all signs of syphilis."
19 Lectures on Syphilis, London, 1881, p. 65.
Mr. Hutchinson says:20 "It is almost an acknowledged law that parents in the late tertiary stages do not transmit taint."
20 The Med. Press and Circular, Aug. 2, 1882, p. 85.
It will be seen from the foregoing extracts, which might be greatly multiplied,21 that there is a strong tendency on the part of many authors to limit more or less strictly the period of transmissibility of syphilis even when the disease is allowed to progress without treatment. As to the facts that it becomes milder with time, both in parents and offspring, that it ceases to be conveyed from husband to wife or vice versâ, that with each succeeding year after the termination of the secondary period the chances of escape of the product of conception increase in a rapidly augmenting ratio,—there is no difference of opinion whatever. Neither is it seriously disputed that the length of time during which the disease remains active, as well as the degree of its activity, may be markedly and beneficially influenced by the administration of mercurial treatment. Under proper medication patients who have rashly or disobediently married in the height of the secondary period have been enabled to escape the danger of transmission either to spouse or offspring—have, in fact, had children born healthy and who never subsequently manifested any symptoms of the disease.
21 M. Diday, Traité de la Syphilis des Nouveau-nés, Paris, 1854, p. 183; M. Bertin, Traité de la Maladie vénérienne chez les Nouveau-nés, Paris, 1870, p. 142; M. Bazin, op. cit., p. 164; M. Roger, L'Union Médicale, 1865, t. i. p. 147 (quoted by Fournier).
I may add that my own experience seems to confirm the views which have thus been set forth. I have notes of all my cases occurring in private practice in a large city—some of them, I regret to say, among personal friends or acquaintances, some of them in our own profession—and have repeatedly given permission to men to marry or to resume marital relations after three years or three years and a half of mild mercurial treatment, to which during the last six months or a year had been added iodide of potassium. In many instances healthy children have been born: in none, so far as I know, has the wife or mother been directly infected. There have been a few doubtful cases in which premature deliveries or stillbirths have occurred, but in nearly every such instance there seemed to be other and entirely competent causes for the accident; and in none of them, as I learned from the father or from the obstetrician in attendance, were the children the subjects of unmistakable syphilitic symptoms.
As to the exact time at which it is safe to permit marriage, and as to the proper treatment before and after that event, it is hardly possible in an essay like this to enter into many details. Yet so much is involved in the answer to our first question that it may not be altogether out of place here to indicate briefly the views of the writer as to general methods of treatment. This is the more proper because in every case of suspected syphilis in a new-born child, in every case of threatened or actual abortion or miscarriage in the wife of a man who has at some time in his life had syphilis, these questions will present themselves, and the answers to them will greatly influence not only the diagnosis and prognosis, but even the treatment, of such cases.