23 This refers, of course, to an ordinary case of syphilis. If the symptoms have been unusually grave, if the deeper tissues or the viscera have been seriously involved, if cerebral or spinal complications have occurred, the situation is of course much more grave, and no step should be taken without the most thoughtful deliberation. The work of Fournier already alluded to (Syphilis and Marriage) furnishes an admirable guide under these circumstances.
Mr. Frederick Lowndes, surgeon to the Liverpool Dock Hospital (Lancet, July 8, 1882), says: "Each case must be judged on its own merits. When the constitution is good, and there has been sufficient specific treatment, marriage may be permitted within a much shorter period than M. Fournier suggests, and with safety. Syphilis alone and syphilis combined with scrofula are two very different foes to contend with, and if our patient be of a scrofulous temperament a delay even longer than M. Fournier's may be desirable."
He quotes Dr. Thomas Edward Beatty in an address at the annual meeting of the British Medical Association at Leeds in 1869: "Mercury given to the man when first diseased would, I firmly believe, have prevented this terrible calamity—i.e. the syphilitic infection of the wife; and I would now humbly suggest to all who undertake the treatment of venereal disease that if they have a certainty that their patients will remain celibate all their lives, they may heal up their sores and dispel their eruptions and sore throats in any manner they like, but that they have no right to expose the pure, innocent, high-minded females of society to contamination by marrying men treated without mercury."
Beyond this in positiveness of assertion it is not safe to go. There may be exceptions to these as to most other hygienic or therapeutic rules, but they will surely be of excessive rarity.
Before considering the methods by which syphilis can reach the child from one or the other of its parents, it may be well to mention the modes in which they can infect each other.
The father can derive syphilis from the mother only in the usual way—i.e. by contagion through a breach of surface permitting of the direct absorption of the poison, the development of the disease being attended by the usual phenomena—chancre, lymphatic enlargement, skin eruptions, etc. The woman may—and in the vast majority of cases does—acquire the disease from the husband in a similar manner. But there seems to be good reason for believing that she may also become infected through the medium of the child, who receives its syphilis directly from the father, the mother up to the time of conception having escaped contagion. More than this, it appears to be highly probable24 that no woman ever bears a syphilitic child and remains herself absolutely free from the disease.
24 The strongest argument against the theory that every woman who has had a syphilitic child has herself been infected lies in the existence of cases like the following, several of which have been observed: The wife of a man having active but untreated syphilis gives birth to one or two syphilitic children, she herself developing no symptoms. Later, the husband is placed on mercurial treatment. She then conceives and gives birth to a healthy child. He stops treatment, and she again bears a syphilitic child, which on his resuming his mercurial course is followed by another healthy infant. Such cases certainly indicate that the syphilis of the mother, if any exists, is incapable of transmission to the child, as the effect of the treatment of the father is too direct and unvarying to admit of doubt.
The existence of this form of infection—syphilis by conception—has been vehemently denied by many authors25—by some on the theoretical grounds that as the essential elements or carriers of the syphilitic virus have been shown to be cells or protoplasmic particles, and as, after conception, the embryo is supplied with serum, but not with cells of any kind, it is impossible that syphilis can be conveyed either to or from it;26 by others on reported observations of numerous cases in which mothers who have been delivered of syphilitic children have shown no evidences of the disease.
25 Kassowitz, Von Baerensprung, Bidenkap, and others.
26 Bumstead and Taylor, op. cit., p. 742.