The object in introducing here these remarks on cooking food is to show that it forms an important integral part of the work of digestion, and has a direct bearing on the management of all forms of dyspepsia.
Haste in eating, with imperfect mastication, is a common cause of indigestion in this country. Mastication is the first step in the digestive process. It is important, therefore, that we have good teeth and that we take time to thoroughly masticate our food, for by so doing we prepare it for being acted upon by the juices of the stomach. Time is also necessary in order that the salivary secretion may be incorporated with the alimentary substances. By the salivary diastase starch is converted into sugar and albuminoids are prepared for the action of the gastric juice. If these changes take place imperfectly, the stomach can scarcely regain in gastric digestion what was lost in imperfect mastication and insalivation. Haste in eating is one of the American vices. It grows out of the temperament of our people. We are jealous of lost time, and unfortunately this time is too often taken from the stomach. We bolt our food with unseemly haste, and pay the penalty in ruined stomachs. Many cases of indigestion are greatly relieved, if not permanently cured, by simply doubling or quadrupling the time occupied in eating.
Irregularity in the intervals between meals, such as taking one meal only in twenty-four hours or taking food before the preceding supply has been digested, is another fruitful source of indigestion. The digestive process, in the natural order of change, is confused; changes which should take place are delayed; and the results are such as arise from excessive eating. Moreover, the stomach lacks the rest so essential to digestion. The necessary interval, however, between meals varies with the nature of the food taken. "Between the extremes of the carnivoræ," says Ewald, "which feed once in twenty-four hours, and the herbivoræ, which never have done with the business of feeding, man holds a middle place, but not without permitting the recognition in the course of his life of a sort of transition from the herbivora to the carnivora. Infants should have the breast during the first three weeks as often as they wake; after that every two hours to the third month; then up to dentition every three hours; and later there should be five meals in twenty-four hours." But to this general statement there are, of course, many exceptions. Under certain pathological conditions food should be taken in small quantities at short intervals. This is especially the case in chronic gastric catarrh and in feeble digestion of nervous subjects. Such patients are not unfrequently improved by becoming again infants or herbivoræ. By the use of an exclusive milk diet or peptonized milk gruels, given in small quantities at comparatively short intervals of time, the stomach may be so accommodated that it will digest without discomfort a large amount of nourishment within a given time. To S. Weir Mitchell of Philadelphia we are indebted for some valuable observations bearing upon this point of forced alimentation.
To the causes of indigestion already alluded to may be added the habit of spirit-drinking, especially the habit of taking alcohol undiluted on an empty stomach, which rarely fails after a time to engender dyspeptic symptoms. It is a prominent factor in the production of chronic gastric catarrh—a condition more frequently present in painful indigestion than any that have been named. It is one of the most common diseases met with in practice. Indeed, all causes already alluded to involve, sooner or later, if they are constantly operative, irritative and catarrhal conditions of the mucous membrane of the stomach, so that we find it difficult at times—indeed impossible—to separate purely functional from subacute inflammatory forms of dyspepsia. Practically, we simply study the subject in the relative degrees of prominence of the one condition or the other.
But, in a still more comprehensive sense, indigestion is caused by disturbance of organs directly associated with the stomach in the digestive process. All organs closely associated with each other in their physiological functions are apt to become associated in morbid action. The clinical recognition of this is a matter of great importance in the management of gastric affections. And first in the order of importance in such association is the liver. So closely, indeed, are the liver and stomach functionally associated in the process of primary assimilation that they may be considered parts of the same great digestive apparatus. Hence disturbance of the liver—either in the formation of glycogen, the destruction of albuminoid matter, or the secretion of bile—is immediately communicated to the stomach. It may be difficult to say which of these separate and distinct functions of the liver is most at fault; that can only be a matter of physiological inference. In the one case, for instance, the dyspeptic may be fairly well nourished, yet his elimination may be bad. In the other there is no failure of the destructive and excreting functions, but those concerned in the assimilation of fat and peptones are disordered, so that the patient is not well nourished, so far as the fatty element is concerned. This is the more common form, and a form not unfrequently associated with pulmonary consumption. The liver finally becomes fatty—a condition usually found associated with the constitutional forms of phthisis.
The pancreas is also closely associated with the stomach, and its secretion is of essential value in the digestive process. It is to be regretted that our precise knowledge of its diseases is in such striking contrast with its importance in the animal economy, and yet it can scarcely be doubted that in dyspeptic symptoms associated with failure of digestion of starchy, albuminous, and fatty elements of food there is disorder of the secretion of the pancreas. Hence in the treatment of the early stages of pulmonary consumption and other disorders associated with deficient digestion and assimilation of fatty substances the importance of directing our attention to the condition of the liver and pancreas, as well as to the stomach.
That morbid states of the intestinal track occupy a prominent place in the etiology of dyspepsia is also a well-recognized clinical fact. Indeed, constipation of the bowels is an almost universal accompaniment of deranged digestion, and when persistent for years it is apt to lead to the most disastrous consequences. These are mainly in the direction of lessened elimination from the intestinal glandulæ. The general symptomatology of deficient excretion from these glandulæ is closely analogous to the same condition of the liver: there is impairment of the general health; the clear florid complexion disappears; the patient becomes of a greenish or sallow hue; the blood is altered in quality; fatigue is experienced after the slightest exertion; the nights are restless; and there is great tendency to mental despondency. Moreover, constipation often precedes the gastric symptoms. The diminished muscular activity of the intestinal track extends to the stomach; its movements are diminished; food is not properly mixed with the gastric juice, and by being too long retained in the stomach in a comparatively undigested state acetous fermentation in the saccharine and starchy articles of diet is set up, acid eructations and a sour taste in the mouth being commonly complained of. Dyspepsia associated with this condition of the intestinal track cannot be relieved until the constipation is relieved, and by overcoming the constipation the dyspeptic symptoms often disappear.
Mention has been made of the baneful influence of certain mental states in the production of dyspeptic symptoms. But there are forms of indigestion due to local nervous disturbance existing elsewhere than in the nerve-centres. This was ascribed by the older writers to what they termed consensus nervorum, or sympathy, by which "the operation of a stimulus is not limited to the nerves immediately irritated, but is extended to distant parts in known or unknown connection with the irritated nerves." An intimate acquaintance with this law of sympathy is of the utmost importance in the study of the functional forms of dyspepsia, for no other organ of the body is subjected to such a wide range of reflected nervous disturbance as the stomach. Morbid sympathetic impressions are transmitted mainly through branches of the vaso-motor nerve of the semilunar ganglia of the abdomen, and from the pneumogastric to the stomach. Thus, a pregnant uterus not unfrequently produces very troublesome vomiting; some females suffer from nausea and indigestion during each menstrual period; and the more chronic forms of pelvic irritation, such as a flexed uterus, and endometritis, cervicitis, or tender ovary, may be the continuous exciting cause of most troublesome forms of nervous dyspepsia. There is also close sympathy of the stomach with the lungs and heart through the distribution of the pneumogastric. So also may fixed points of irritation in any part of the nervous system be reflexly transmitted to the stomach, giving rise to most pronounced symptoms of indigestion. And it is evident that in all such cases but little can be accomplished in the way of relieving the dyspeptic symptoms until the cause upon which they depend is removed. The treatment must have reference mainly to the removal of such cause.
Lastly, all the causes mentioned finally concur in producing irregularities of the mechanism of digestion; and this may be done by disturbing either the muscular movements of the stomach or in suspending or perverting the gastric solvents, or in these two conditions combined.
SYMPTOMS.—1st. Referable to the Stomach.—The symptoms which attend and indicate the presence of functional dyspepsia are such as accompany in a greater or less degree almost all cases of chronic gastritis. Clinically, so far as the direct gastric symptoms are concerned, it is difficult to separate them. The more prominent of the local symptoms are—a sense of fulness and distension after meals, discomfort during the digestive process, derangement of appetite, acid eructations, flatulence, regurgitations of food, and sometimes nausea and vomiting. There is seldom severe pain; the sensation is rather that of uneasiness. Exceptionally, however, there may be pain, which radiates from the stomach to the shoulders, and may pass down the left arm so as to simulate angina pectoris. But it may be readily distinguished from that complaint by coming on after food, and not after exertion. In other cases a sense of constriction may be accompanied by dyspnoea, arising from impeded movements of the diaphragm from being pushed upward by the distended stomach, or there may be heartburn, with an ill-defined sense of burning felt in the epigastrium; but thirst, so frequently present in chronic gastritis, is, as a rule, absent in functional dyspepsia. These symptoms are manifested in varying degrees of prominence in individual cases, and some of them are rarely found present. Thus, nausea and vomiting are not characteristic features of the chronic forms of functional dyspepsia, and as a rule epigastric tenderness is entirely absent. In markedly hysterical subjects or in persons whose nervous system has been unduly excited by alcohol there may be shrinking from the slightest touch upon pressure; but in these cases the tenderness is not confined to the stomach, nor is it increased by deep pressure. In some cases there is an unnatural craving for food—a symptom rarely if ever observed in structural lesions of the stomach—and now and then it happens that the appetite becomes depraved, especially with hysterical patients. They crave indigestible and unnatural substances, such as earth, chalk, and substances wholly devoid of alimentary properties. Impairment of appetite, however, is the more common feature of this form of indigestion.