In Habershon's second division, under which he ranks the cases of peritonitis caused by "a changed condition of the blood," he ascribes 63 to albuminuria. Every physician knows how often meningitis or pericarditis or pleurisy may occur under these circumstances, especially in young persons; but, for myself, I cannot but express surprise at these figures. In one capacity or another I have been connected with large hospitals for forty-eight years, and have seen many cases of albuminuria in private practice, and can recall but few instances in which kidney disease, excepting cancer and other tumors, has terminated in peritonitis. In modification of this statement, however, it is proper to add that the hospital physician cannot know how half the diseases he treats terminate, on account of the American plan of interrupted service, and even less can he know of the mode of death in cases which he sees in consultation. Even with this admission, from my standpoint it is not easy to believe that one-eighth of the cases of peritonitis are caused by albuminuria.
The word pyæmia used by Habershon, it seems to me, ought to be replaced by septicæmia, and it has been by many of the profession. Sédillot many years ago proved that laudable pus injected into the blood-vessels of the dog produced no signs of disease, but that septic pus, so used, was followed by grave symptoms, even death. Among the author's cases thirteen were associated with the septic poison. He also found five which he thinks were independent of erysipelas. One in one hundred is a proportion hardly large enough to establish the relation of cause and effect against the chances of concurrence.
I can make a remark with reference to the inquiry by C. Dubacy in the October number (1881) of the American Journal of Medical Sciences, whether diphtheria produces peritonitis. When diphtheria became epidemic among us in 1860 or 1861 for several years, I saw a great deal of it, but did not recognize any relation between it and peritonitis.
The relations of hernia, injuries, and operations to peritonitis need no commentary.
Perforations of the alimentary canal may require some illustrative statements. These occur most frequently in the vermiform appendix of the cæcum, and are almost invariably caused by some irritating substance imprisoned in its tube. In some cases it is a seed of some fruit, as the orange or lemon; in others, a cherry-pit; in one that I remember it was a small stone, such as is sometimes found in rice; in others, a hard fecal concretion; in one, a child, a singular formation: a strawberry-seed was the centre; around this a layer of fecal matter, around the fecal matter a calcareous layer, on this, again, a fecal layer, and so on to the number of six layers, the external one being calcareous. This body was about one-fourth of an inch in diameter, and may have been years in forming. In this connection I may state, per contra, that I am informed that in a pathological museum in Boston is preserved an appendix that contains, and did contain, a large number of bird-shot, which did no mischief except to enlarge the appendix. This was from the body of a man who had shot and eaten many birds. My observation has led me to the belief that a large proportion of the cases of peritonitis occurring in children are due to perforation of the appendix.
Of the diseases of the liver producing acute diffuse peritonitis, the foremost, I think, is abscess, single or multiple. The different modes in which gall-stones may produce it may be illustrated by the following cases: (1) A lady died of acute peritonitis. At post-mortem examination a large abscess was found, bounded above by the liver, in other directions by adherent intestines; it contained nearly a quart of pus: at the bottom of the sac was a single gall-stone, very large and very black; the gall-bladder was perforated and very much shrunken. The gall-stone had caused an ulceration of the gall-bladder, but none of the intestines, in this respect differing from the process known as painless transit of a gall-stone. So the calculus caused the abscess, and the abscess caused the general peritonitis. (2) A lady between fifty and sixty years of age had an attack of gall-stone pains; she had had them before. In a few hours symptoms of peritonitis were manifest, and she died. The post-mortem examination showed the ductus cysticus was ulcerated and perforated. Two gall-stones of large size had been formed in the gall-bladder, and had been pushed forward into the duct about halfway to the common duct, leaving it enlarged as they advanced. The foremost one had caused an ulcer on the anterior or lower side of the duct, and bile had escaped, staining all the right half of the abdominal cavity, and throughout this half only the parts were covered with false membrane and stained with bile.
These cases are not so very uncommon. John Freeland of Antigua had a patient, a colored woman sixty-five years of age, who had been suffering from intermittent fever, gastric disorder, and retching. In one of the vomiting spells she experienced great pain, which, being relieved by an opiate, soon returned and was attended by tympanitic and tender abdomen. Death occurred in collapse about eight hours later. The cavity of the abdomen was found filled with blood and bile, the intestines inflamed and gangrenous in spots, and there was general peritonitis. The gall-bladder was empty; the hepatic duct was lacerated, and contained pouches in which gall-stones were encysted. One of these bags was lacerated. This laceration was surrounded by evidences of recent inflammation, and caused the general peritonitis.2
2 The Medical Record, Dec. 9, 1882.
The perforations of the stomach which I have seen have been attended by little inflammation of the peritoneum. Death has followed this accident in twenty to thirty-six hours. There has been little pain, little tumefaction of the bowels, little tenderness, but a sense of sinking and a peculiar feeling at the stomach which the patient finds it difficult to describe.
The ulcers of dysentery do at times perforate all the coats of the colon, and yet do not with any uniformity cause general peritonitis; but as the destructive process approaches the outer covering the latter becomes inflamed, and lymph enough is effused to close the opening and prevent the escape of the contents of the intestine; so that, while perforation is not uncommon, I have rarely seen diffuse peritonitis accompanying dysentery.