It is not possible to give indications by which the origin of blood in the lungs may be positively determined except by a reference to other symptoms than the hæmoptysis. In general, bronchial hemorrhage is characterized by a bright-red, fresh color, is aërated, unmixed, and uncoagulated. In pulmonary or parenchymatous hæmoptysis the blood is dark, non-aërated, and coagulated to some degree, and often alternates with a mixed blood and mucus sputum. These distinctions are not reliable, and must be supplemented by all of our clinical resources in the case before us. The author maintains that in the hæmoptysis of phthisis the hemorrhage in the large majority of cases is both bronchial and pulmonary. The typical parenchymatous hemorrhage is found in hemorrhagic infarction and pulmonary apoplexy, which, compared with phthisis, are rare occasions for hæmoptysis. This general statement will form the basis of what follows in this exposition.
HISTORY.—Historically, there are not many phases in the doctrine of hæmoptysis. Controversy has been chiefly confined to its relations to phthisis as cause or effect.
The simplicity and directness of observation of the ancients give a special interest to their views of hæmoptysis. They believed that it was oftener cause than effect. They found a warranty of that opinion in what they thought was a direct conversion of blood into pus, and in the irritating qualities of the latter. Hippocrates'1 fundamental statements are, "Ex sanguinis sputo, puris sputum malum;" "Ex sanguinis vomitione tabes et puris purgatio per superiora purgatio;" "Ex sanguinis sputo puris sputum et fluor, ubi autem sputum retinetur moriuntur." Another statement of his is given in translation by Peter:2 "When some of the veins of the lung are ruptured the hemorrhage is in proportion to the size of the vessel; a part, on the contrary, unless the vein be very small, diffuses itself in the lung, putrefies there, and after having putrefied forms pus. As a result, it is at one time true pus, at another pus mixed with blood, and another time it is pure blood, which is rejected; and if the vein was very full it is from it that the mass of the blood comes, and thick pus, mixed with putrefied pituitous secretion, is expectorated."
1 Edition 1696, book 7, p. 1141, Aphorisms 15 and 16, 80 and 81.
2 Clinique médicale, tome 112, p. 243. The precise locality of this quotation is not given by Peter, but it is from Hippocrates' Opera, ed. Kuhn, Leipsic, 1825, vol. ii. p. 178.
Thomas Young3 gives the following sentences from Hippocrates' Predictions and Aphorisms: "The most dangerous consumptives are cured by a rupture of the great vessel which corrodes the lungs;" "Purulent expectoration after hæmoptysis is dangerous;" "In some cases consumption originates from an effusion of blood into the lungs without hæmoptysis, especially after a strain or accidental injury; a collection of phlegmatic humors form around it by causing pain and cough, with purulent and bloody expectoration." All of these quotations show the Hippocratic doctrine distinctly, that the hæmoptysis where it appeared in a case was mostly the cause of the subsequent phthisis, and that phthisis ab hæmoptoe was not only one of the most common, but one of the most dangerous forms.
3 A Practical Historical Treatise on Consumption Diseases, London, 1815, p. 111.
The doctrine that blood effused into the lungs became pus, and produced corroding and ulcerating effects, appears in many other prominent authors between the Hippocratic writings and the nineteenth century. Celsus4 (30–40 A.C.) says: "Hæmoptysis is one of the causes of purulent expectoration." Galen5 (131–201 A.C.) says: "Phthisis is lung ulceration;" and he thinks "that in the greatest number of cases it originates in a mechanical way, through tearing of the tissue by means of an outpouring of blood in consequence of a catarrh or strain." This extract would imply that he thought the hæmoptysis in many cases secondary, but that when it did occur it had the effect which Hippocrates attributed to it, that of producing "purulence of the lungs." Sylvius6 (1614–1672) says: "Hæmoptysis is one of the causes of purulent expectoration."
4 Young, op. cit., p. 128.
5 Waldenburg, Die Tuberculose, p. 19.