19 Vide "Prize Essay."
Appreciating clearly the characters which are distinctive of cavernous respiration, it is impossible to confound this sign with bronchial respiration, both the inspiratory and the expiratory sound in the latter sign being high in pitch and tubular in quality. This cavernous sign approaches much nearer to the normal vesicular respiration. The only distinction between these two signs is the presence of the vesicular quality in the latter and its absence in the former. Hence, the only liability to error is in confounding the two. This error can only be committed when the respiratory murmur is so feeble that the vesicular quality is not readily appreciable. In order to avoid the error, the respiration should not be pronounced cavernous when the sounds are quite weak, except there be present other correlative cavernous signs.
Cavities are often situated in close proximity to lung solidified by tuberculous deposit or interstitial pneumonia: cavernous respiration and bronchial respiration are then in juxtaposition, and their differential characters are rendered very distinct by contrast. Under these circumstances, however, the cavernous respiration is sometimes modified by combination with the characters of the bronchial respiration. Not infrequently a cavernous inspiration is joined to a bronchial expiration, the more intense expiratory sound representing adjacent solidification extending over the site of the cavity and drowning the weaker cavernous expiration. In another mode of combination the inspiratory sound is bronchial at the beginning and cavernous at the end. Here the cavernous sound occurs a little later than the bronchial, and the latter is supplanted by the former. This variety of broncho-cavernous respiration has been recently described by Seitz under the name metamorphosing respiratory murmur (metamorphosirendes athmungs geräusch). In like manner, the characters of the cavernous and of the normal vesicular respiration may be combined. This combination may be expressed by the term vesiculo-cavernous respiration.
The effect of a cavity upon vocal resonance is to increase its intensity without giving rise to the characters distinctive of bronchophony—namely, nearness to the ear, concentration, and elevation of pitch. Increased vocal resonance, and not bronchophony, is therefore a cavernous sign. If bronchophony be present over a cavity, it denotes adjacent solidification of lung. With the vocal resonance more or less increased the vocal fremitus appreciable on auscultation is often intensified.
A cavernous whisper has the characters of the expiratory sound in the cavernous respiration; that is, it is low in pitch and blowing or non-tubular in quality, being in contrast, as regards these characters, with a high-pitched tubular sound in whispering bronchophony. The latter sign is often found near a cavity, showing the proximity of solidified lung.
Amphoric respiration, amphoric voice, and amphoric whisper are pathognomonic signs of a cavity, provided pneumothorax be excluded. The same is to be said of metallic tinkling, a very rare cavernous sign. Gurgling within a circumscribed space is a cavernous sign of some value. Pectoriloquy—that is, the transmission of articulated words—is not, per se, a cavernous sign; that is to say, the speech may be transmitted by solidified lung as well as through a cavity. This is true alike of words spoken with the loud and with the whispered voice. It is, however, easy to determine whether pectoriloquy be or be not due to a cavity. If with the loud voice the transmitted speech be unaccompanied by the characters of bronchophony, it denotes a cavity. So, if transmitted whispered words be unaccompanied by the characters of the bronchophonic whisper, they denote a cavity. On the other hand, the transmission is by solidified lung if bronchophony and pectoriloquy be conjoined in either the loud or the whispered voice.
The shrinkage of lung incident to the formation of tuberculous cavities increases the depression apparent on inspection in the infra-clavicular region. The site of a cavity is sometimes indicated by a circumscribed bulging of intercostal spaces, within a localized area, on forced expiration or an act of coughing. A sharply-defined circumscribed depression corresponding to the area of a cavity is visible in some cases. Another effect of shrinkage of lung is to uncover the aorta in the second intercostal space on the right side, or the pulmonary artery in a corresponding situation on the left side. The pulsation of these arteries may then be perceived by the touch, and perhaps, also, by the eye. This effect should not lead to the error of inferring the existence of aneurism. Shrinkage of the upper lobe of the left lung may cause considerable elevation of the heart, also enlarging considerably the space within which is felt the cardiac impulse.
With a practical knowledge of the physical signs of which a concise account has been given, it is practicable to determine, first, the existence of phthisis in its incipiency when the tuberculous affection is small; second, during the progress of the disease to ascertain the degree and the extent of the tuberculous solidification; and, third, to recognize the existence of, and to localize, cavities.
Recapitulating the signs belonging to the foregoing phases of the disease, in incipient phthisis they are slight dulness on percussion, broncho-vesicular respiration approximating to the normal vesicular or a respiratory murmur too weak for its characters to be studied, some increase of vocal resonance, increased bronchial whisper, and, as occasional accompanying signs, subcrepitant râles, pleuritic friction murmur, and abnormal transmission of the heart-sounds, more or less of these signs being limited to the summit of the chest on one side. After further progress of the phthisical affection the signs are, dulness on percussion more or less marked, either a broncho-vesicular respiration approximating to the bronchial or a purely bronchial respiration, either notable increase of vocal resonance or bronchophony, either increase of the bronchial whisper or whispering bronchophony, and moist bronchial or bubbling râles which may be either coarse or fine, or both may be combined. After the affection has advanced to the formation of cavities the cavernous signs are added to those of solidification—namely, circumscribed tympanitic resonance on percussion, cracked-metal and amphoric resonance, cavernous respiration, cavernous whisper, increased vocal resonance and gurgling. Pectoriloquy may be present before and after the formation of cavities; in the former instance the transmission of speech being by solidified lung, and in the latter through a cavity, the two modes of transmission being easily differentiated by means of the characters associated with the pectoriloquy.
An intercurrent pneumonia, not tuberculous, may lead to the error of supposing the tuberculous affection to be much greater than it is. Especially is there liability to this error if the patient have not been under observation prior to the intercurrent pneumonia. The latter may give rise to bronchial respiration and bronchophony, with notable dulness on percussion over a considerable space. If the patient have been under observation, the rapidity with which the solidification denoted by these signs has been developed is a diagnostic point. A notable diminution of the solidification within a few weeks or days is evidence that it was due to an intercurrent pneumonia. The tuberculous deposit is never absorbed with such rapidity. The following case may serve as an illustration of this complication: A man aged thirty had had for some time slight cough and want of breath on active exercise, but he had kept about, actively engaged in business, until within a few days of the date of my visit. He was then up and dressed, his chief complaint being want of breath on any exertion. The physical signs gave evidence of considerable solidification of the upper lobe of the right lung. The question was, whether the solidification was due exclusively to phthisis, or whether with this disease was associated an intercurrent pneumonia. The question was settled definitively by an examination of the chest six weeks afterward. At the time of this examination the solidification had in a great measure disappeared; there was only slight dulness on percussion, with increase of vocal resonance and feeble respiratory murmur. Meanwhile, the symptoms had denoted progressive improvement; the cough was now slight; he no longer suffered from want of breath on exertion, and he had improved as regards appetite, strength, etc. This patient consulted me seven years and four months afterward. In the mean time he had considered himself in fair health, but he had been subject to cough, and for the preceding six months the cough had been persistent. There was now dulness at the summit of the chest on the right side, with feeble broncho-vesicular respiration, increase of vocal resonance, abnormal transmission of the heart-sounds, and subcrepitant râles. He had held his weight and strength, and his appetite and digestion were good.