80 "Dis. of Pleura," in Ziemmsen's Appendix.
Modern aspirators, if in perfectly good order, completely prevent the possibility of septic contamination by admission of air. Unclean needles and canulæ can—and we fear formerly often did—convert sero-fibrinous into purulent pleurisies. A case came under Powell's observation in which carelessness in this respect apparently led to decomposition of the fluid, suppurative pleurisy, and ultimately to the death of the patient. Before operating we ought always to test the instrument, and see that it works well by passing carbolized water through it. The points should be put in the flame of a spirit-lamp, and then dipped in carbolized water and glycerin—not in oil, which may be rancid. The hands and clothes of the operator should not be overlooked in this regard. The atmosphere of the room should previously be completely cleansed by ventilation, and afterward purified by atomization of disinfectants. We must not, in a word, incur the slightest risk of converting a simple inflammatory effusion of fibro-serous fluid, a mild disease, into a suppurative inflammation, a very troublesome, dangerous one.
A needle of not larger diameter than 1 millimeter (No. 2) should be connected with the end of the tubing. Next turn the stopcocks which shut off the barrel from the tubing on both sides, producing a vacuum in the receiver. The patient should then be placed in the recumbent position in bed, with his head and chest raised. We prefer this position, as the easiest for the patient at the time of operation and less apt to produce syncope or faintness. He can, without being moved, lie down in the horizontal position, which he should maintain for at least two hours. Bowditch has, without any accident, had his patients to sit during operation sidewise in a chair, with one arm resting upon a pillow placed upon the top of the back. The operation is accompanied with so little pain that it is not necessary to use either general or local anæsthesia. Some surgeons advise before operating the administration of a small dose of morphia hypodermically, or a stimulating drink of whiskey. We are not in the habit of using either. We have generally allowed patients to take a good meal of easily-digested food (milk if they consent) about two hours previous to the operation. Whiskey and ammonia we have ready in case of need. If we find it necessary to use a 4-mm. canula for syphon, it may be best to spare the pain of its introduction by local anæsthesia by ether, or by rhigoline in Richardson's spray, or by applying a piece of ice surrounded by salt, as suggested by Powell.
The point of puncture should vary according to the quantity of fluid. If the fluid is excessive, we can operate as high up as the fifth intercostal space on the right side and the seventh on the left. We can choose a lower intercostal, but as it is not proposed to draw off all the fluid, the higher operation is preferable. If the chest is two-thirds full, we can take the seventh or sixth intercostal space on the right side and eighth on the left. If only one-third of the cavity is occupied by fluid, we can go as low as the eighth intercostal on right and left sides, on a level with the angle of the scapula in the axillary line. If the quantity of liquid is so great as to force the abdominal viscera, especially the liver and the spleen, below their normal position, we may be safe in puncturing below the seventh intercostal space. But if such is not the case, the diaphragm may easily be touched on a level with even the seventh intercostal space. Aran plunged a trocar into the liver when operating through the seventh intercostal space. Ch. Bernard impinged upon the peritoneum at the same point. Woillez and Paul Barbille recommend the fifth intercostal space. Cruveilhier advises the third or fourth as being the point of the spontaneous openings. The author usually inserts the needle in the sixth intercostal space in the mid-axillary line: it is out of reach of the diaphragm and is accessible when the patient lies in the position in which he prefers placing him. The space is sufficiently wide and the parietes thin. Before operating the point must be examined carefully by percussion, auscultation, and palpation, so as to be accurate in the diagnosis that there is fluid at that point, and that nothing can be injured—lung, heart, or diaphragm.
Before inserting the needle the skin should be wiped over with an antiseptic solution. The skin being drawn up, the nail of the left index finger serving as a director, the point, having been first made aseptic, is introduced along the upper margin of the lower rib, taking care not to injure the periosteum—not by a boring motion, but by a sharp push, giving it a downward direction instead of a perfectly straight one, so as to avoid striking the lung. When the fluid is reached the stopcock is turned, so as to convert the needle into an aspirator. The index tells us whether we have struck the fluid, and its nature is shown. In chronic cases, where the bands are thick and partitions are firm, we may not find the fluid the first time. In such cases the needle is withdrawn and another point selected. The author had a case where he made no less than eight punctures before getting the fluid. At the last insertion of the needle he found it, and drew off a large quantity. The patient feels relieved in a very short time. As the fluid flows out the aspirating force should be only sufficient to draw it out slowly and gently. It is well to stop for a few minutes after aspirating about 4 fluidounces to watch the effects. The fluid running in a very small stream, we give the lung time to accommodate itself to its altered condition. The lung by this process is led, rather than forced, to resume its normal position. It is a difficult matter to fix the quantity that ought to be drawn off at one time. This must vary according to the circumstances of each case. Our rule has been to draw off more when the pleurisy is acute than when it is chronic. The long continuance of the fluid in the cavity has so impaired the lung's capability of expansion by the adhesive bands or compresses that the sudden withdrawal of a large quantity is attended with risk. If the patient bears the operation well, we may remove much more than if the contrary is the case. The amount withdrawn at the first operation should vary from 8 fluidounces to 16 fluidounces in a child, and 12 fluidounces to 24 fluidounces for an adult. We must bear in mind, as to the quantity to be removed, that ordinarily there is more or less danger of producing fresh engorgement of the capillaries and hyperæmia of the lung in removing a large quantity; and, moreover, it is unnecessary. We wish to remove the intra-thoracic pressure upon the lung and to promote the absorption of the fluid. The manometer will tell us accurately whether it is necessary to take out one, two, or three pints. If nature does not in due time remove what is left, the operation can be again resorted to. Slowness in the withdrawal of the fluid, as well as the small quantity drawn, lessens the probability of any unpleasant effects. Bowditch says: "I always draw with great deliberation. I pull so lightly upon the handle of the piston that it seems as if the fluid itself were pressing out from the chest and pushed the piston upward, my hand simply following that impulse. The instant that the patient becomes restless, especially if he have any constriction or sharp pain in the chest, I withdraw the tube, even if a large quantity of fluid remains. If I do this, I find the patient is soon relieved, and in most cases nature appears stimulated even by the withdrawal of a very small part of the effusion. The absorbents begin to act well, and the fluid that is left is speedily removed."
One point is of the utmost importance: the needle should be instantly withdrawn at the onset of dyspnoea, constriction, much cough, or any tendency to syncope. These symptoms are warnings we should never neglect. This is the time to administer stimulants, and ordinarily the patient soon recovers from these effects. We must not, especially in cases of long duration, expect to find much expansion of the lung until next day. The greatest success has followed cases treated by early operation and partial removals, repeated, if necessary, every day or two until absorption is commenced.
The needle should be taken out suddenly, the operator having previously turned the stopcock, and the skin allowed at once to fall over the orifice, which is so small that no air can enter. It is indeed obliterated at once. It may be well, however, to put some collodion over it, with a small compress. The patient ought not to be permitted to move for twenty-four hours after the operation. He should lie quietly in bed and partake of simple nourishment. The removal of fluid causes the return of friction sounds and of pleuritic pain. Nature slowly does her work of absorbing the fibrinous bands. The breath-sounds in some cases are not heard for weeks, or even months, after the operation. Complete recovery being slow, and the shock to the organism very serious, the patient should thoroughly re-establish his health and strength before reassuming his active duties. A protracted rest in an invigorating climate or a sea-voyage should be advised. If the lung is slow to expand, the patient should frequently practise long, deep inspirations.
Dangers of and Objections to the Operation.—Thoracentesis as a means of relieving suffering humanity has from time to time been praised and proscribed, even in this century. Boyer operated several times, and never saved a single case. Dupuytren had only 2 successful cases in 50. He said he preferred that his patients should die by the hand of God rather than by the hand of man. Sir Astley Cooper had only 1 successful case, Gendrin not 1 out of 20 cases. Davis saved two-thirds of his cases. The eminent W. W. Gerhard of Philadelphia looked upon the operation as nearly always attended by fatal results. What a contrast to modern views and clinical results! Since Bowditch and Trousseau popularized the operation, and Dieulafoy improved the aspirating instruments, there is now no difference of opinion as to the imperative necessity of operating in cases where there is, from the quantity of fluid, imminent danger to life. Up to Nov., 1882, Bowditch81 had operated 386 times in 245 cases, without a single fatal result, and with only 1 case in which alarming symptoms supervened. Dieulafoy's82 cases in 1878 amounted to 150, without the shadow of an accident. My colleague, S. C. Chew, has never met with any unpleasant result from his operations. The author has had 84 cases, with 138 operations, without any unpleasant result beyond temporary cough and slight dyspnoea. Fraentzel83 had 85 different cases, with 164 operations. A. L. Mason84 performed 122 operations in 70 cases, with no unfavorable result which could be attributed to the operation in any instance, but usually with great and permanent relief. In 42 of his cases 1 operation was all that was necessary. So common is the operation that cases are not reported unless there is something to attract attention to them. As illustrative of the great interest taken in the operation see the number of writers on the subject and the numberless articles in medical journals, and the modifications of instruments of all kinds connected with aspiration and drainage. Such being the case, we ought not to be surprised that some operators may have used the aspirator-needle when they ought not to have done so—that some should have neglected the simple rules now insisted upon as the result of experience.
81 Unpublished MSS.
82 Tho. Pleu. Aig., 1878.