167 "Resection du Côltes de Emp.," Revue Mens. de Méd. et Surg., 1879, vol. B.
168 Med. News, Philada., Sept., 1882.
Jacobi169 says that resections ought not to be practised upon children. W. A. Lane,170 from the observation of 5 cases of empyema in children, strongly recommends that a portion of rib or ribs be removed at first, and the cavity thoroughly drained from the beginning. It assists, he argues, the cure by promoting the falling in of the ribs, the expansion of the lungs, and the ascent of the diaphragm. In children the difficulty in securing free drainage is that the spaces between the ribs are small, and after the cavity is opened they become much more contracted; soft tubes thus become compressed, and hard tubes cause much local irritation. Resection of ribs enables the operator to keep the orifice open and have perfect drainage. The opening should be large enough to allow the introduction of the finger and of an india-rubber tube of sufficient diameter to give free passage to the contents of the chest, without the tube being displaced by movement of the ribs. In only one of Lane's cases was trouble caused by rapid increase of bone. He operated as low as the ninth intercostal space in the axillary line, taking care always, by the hypodermic syringe, to ascertain that there was pus at that point. He divided the periosteum longitudinally, and removed with cutting forceps about three-quarters of an inch of rib. After he had thoroughly cleared out the cavity he introduced a short india-rubber tube, so that its inner end should not project into the cavity. Wire sutures were passed deeply through the intercostal tissues and tube, and, to render the position of the tube more secure, soft pins were fixed through the wall of the tube, and attached to them were pieces of elastic surrounding the chest.
169 N.Y. Med. Record, Jan., 1881.
170 Guy's Hospital Reports, vol. xli., 1882.
If necessary in order to have uninterrupted free drainage, children as well as adults should have their ribs resected. The important point in operating is to secure free exit to the fluid and purification of the cavity by the necessary washings by the open method. Pleurotomy by resection of ribs is almost universally acknowledged to be the most effective treatment, for it promotes most rapidly the agglutination of the pleural surfaces and the expansion of the lung.171
171 Lawson Tait strongly advocates this same method of treatment in peritonitis. He has performed laparotomy successfully in 20 cases, using washings and drainage-tubes (Bost. Med. and Surg. Journal, Aug. 16, 1883).
Good drainage is the essential consideration after the operation. We must prevent putrefaction or fetid decomposition in the pleural contents. So long as pus is retained within the sac, it does not putrefy, but putrefaction follows contact with the putrefactive agencies which abound in ordinary air, as shown by Pasteur and Tyndal. These are solid particles floating in the atmosphere. Although air must be admitted, it should be rendered aseptic. The drainage-tube, which should be just long enough to go thoroughly into the cavity, by itself is in many cases insufficient. The upper part of the cavity may retain on its surface pus and flocculi which may prove dangerous. By the syphon we can fill the cavity slowly with medicated tepid water without shock and without risk of tearing away the neo-membranes. Woillez172 advises that pleurotomy should be promptly used whenever pus is found. Béhier advocates the same treatment. E. Moutard-Martin,173 whose authority is high from his great experience and conservatism, advises us always to commence the treatment with thoracentesis by aspiration. He says, if the fever persists and the general condition grows worse, he does not hesitate to resort to pleurotomy. The author's more limited experience coincides with his. I. Marshall174 states as his opinion that purulent pleurisies require the immediate or early adoption of the open method. In fibro-serous pleurisy we wish to restore the physiological condition of the pleura, whereas in purulent cases the object is to obliterate the sac by adhesions throughout the surfaces, just as abscesses are cured. It is necessary that the costal and pulmonary pleura and that of the diaphragm should be brought closely in contact. This is produced simultaneously by the dilatation of the lung and the diminution in every way of the pleural cavity. The dilatation is produced by the disappearance of the intra-pleural pressure and the pressure in the opposite direction from the bronchial surfaces. This last depends upon the condition of the lung and of the visceral pleura. If the lung has been long compressed, it is almost carnified and reduced to a state of foetal atelectasis. It rarely happens that the bands which bind the lung down do not in time undergo granular fatty degeneration and disappear. This enables the lung to expand, if not to its original size, yet sufficiently to occupy the cavity, reduced in size by the approach of the walls. The heart, which previous to the operation was thrown more or less out of its normal position, comes back from the empty side, and often passes the position that it normally occupied. The lung follows the heart. The whole mediastinum finds itself altered in its position and in its contents. The depressed diaphragm rises promptly to its old position in the pleural cavity. The liver, spleen, and the rib-wall undergo striking modifications. We do not expect the lung to dilate to its full extent, as after aspirations in simple pleurisies. The lung, indeed, is already impaired in its movement. We admit air in order to secure treatment to these surfaces. When air is admitted into the normal chest, the lung is retracted to about one-half its size. In serous effusions we fear free admissions of air, because it assists in compressing the lungs, and may contain germs which promote suppuration. We must bear in mind that we may have double pleurisy from the pus producing pleural necrosis at the point of contact of the pleural sacs about the middle of the sternum opposite the middle of the third rib. Elsewhere there is no such danger, for the pleural surfaces remain a long distance from each other.
172 Bul. Soc. Méd. des Hôp., 26 April, 1872.
173 Pleurisie purulente, 1872.