The symptoms of cardiac thrombosis vary naturally with their size, situation, and rapidity of formation. Certain authors have affirmed, for example, that the concretions formed in an auricle cause a greater amount of interference with the circulation than those elsewhere situated. This they do partly by reason of their size and the less contractile power possessed by the auricle, partly because from the auricle prolongations are sent off which occlude the cardiac orifices. When cardiac concretions form suddenly a few days previous to death, they always aggravate all the symptoms of an obstructed circulation.32 If the case be one of pre-existing disease of the heart, they soon obliterate the cardiac cavities and lead to a rapid fatal termination. According to Grisolle,33 when the concretions are small and form an obstacle neither to the play of the valves nor to the cardiac circulation, they are not revealed by any appreciable functional trouble. The opinion of Grisolle in regard to small coagula is also shared by Legroux, especially when they are fixed at a distance from a cardiac orifice or concealed in a sinus. When, however, the thrombi are larger and interfere more or less with the course of the blood, they occasion very marked symptoms.
32 Hope, On the Heart, p. 486, Philada., 1846.
33 Pathologie interne, p. 467, Paris, 1865.
Even before the days of auscultation there were certain rational signs which were dwelt upon with much force as showing the presence of cardiac concretions. Thus, Senac34 writes that the patients thus afflicted feel a weight or oppression in the præcordial region which sometimes becomes extremely painful. Palpitations and irregularities of the pulse were also noted as symptomatic of these productions. Laennec believes that coagula of any size may be recognized; "when, in a patient who till then had presented regular pulsations of the heart, these suddenly became so anomalous, confused, and obscure that they can no longer be analyzed, we may suspect the formation of a polypous concretion."35 He further adds that if the trouble takes place on one side alone of the heart, the fact is almost certain. When the coagula occupy the cavities of the right heart, the sounds of the left heart may remain normal whilst those of the right side are more or less distant and muffled (Legroux). Several authors, amongst whom we should mention Legroux, Bouillaud, Barth, and Roger, have mentioned amongst the physical characters which show the existence of intra-cardiac thrombi the sudden development of a blowing murmur limited to the præcordial region or propagated into the aorta. Sometimes this bruit was soft, sometimes harsh and rough. These writers have also noticed, in conjunction with grave general symptoms, the doubling of the first sound of the heart, making occasionally a sort of galloping murmur. As regards the recognition of concretions on one side alone, I acknowledge that after auscultating carefully several cases in which the autopsy showed coagula formed during life, I have been unable to note signs sufficient to justify a differential diagnosis.
34 Traité de la Structure du Coeur, de son Action et de ses Maladies, t. ii. p. 470 et suix, quoted by Bucquoy.
35 De l'Auscult., t. ii. p. 597, quoted by Hope.
The distinction appears to me difficult in like cases, for how explain that a trouble so considerable, even though it exists on one side only, should not influence the entire cardiac circulation? Moreover, it should be emphasized that the phenomena dwelt upon do not always manifest themselves when the cardiac contractions are perfectly normal. The heart-beats may be increased in frequency and the rhythm be changed. The passage, therefore, from a state of relative calm merely to that of extreme agitation is appreciated less readily. This is particularly true of the symptoms usually described as pertaining to the presence of terminal coagula. For here, at a period approximating the fatal termination, it is wellnigh impossible to determine accurately special symptoms. For this reason it is not surprising how authors have varied in their descriptions, and at best none of them are completely full and satisfactory. I have myself many times sought to recognize the blowing murmur given by Bouillaud as a physical sign of cardiac concretions, but in not a single instance have I been able to satisfy myself as to its existence. True it is that the cases I have watched with greatest care were those of children affected with toxic diphtheria, and it is possible, on account of the infrequency of valvular diseases during childhood, that more than once there may have been confusion between the signs afforded by newly-formed thrombi and those which belonged exclusively to a pre-existing disease of the endocardium.
Moreover, these murmurs have been heard and described by too many good observers (Walshe, Flint, Richardson) for any small negative evidence to weigh against that which is very positive. Sometimes they have been but the exaggeration of a bruit previously heard and which characterized an organic affection of the heart. Sometimes the presence of the thrombus has caused the diminution or complete disappearance of the pre-existing structural murmur. Again, these murmurs are discovered for the first time when the other signs indicate the existence of intra-cardiac thrombi. When they are heard under these circumstances they prove positively that the coagula have sent prolongations between the cavities of the heart or into the great vessels, so as to prevent the accurate coaptation of the valves or to obstruct the onward current of the blood. In the first case a regurgitant murmur is occasioned, tricuspid or mitral, which is heard at the apex; in the second case a basic murmur is detected, which is pulmonary or aortic. Usually these murmurs are systolic, although they may in rare conditions be diastolic. The murmurs have been heard more frequently on the right side of the heart, and have pointed by their location of greatest intensity to the obstruction of the infundibulum and pulmonary orifice. They are then basic or suprabasic, and carried upward toward the infra-clavicular region on the left side. These murmurs are heard very rarely on the left side—so infrequently, indeed, that Walshe cannot affirm that he has ever observed clinically one in this region. Theoretically, of course, such murmurs may be heard at any spot in the præcordial region, and with the first or second sounds provided their size and position in relation to orifices or valves could sufficiently account for them. Whilst there can be little question that murmurs do take place in the præcordial region wholly due to the presence of heart-clot, it is probable that their frequency and diagnostic importance is less than superficial consideration would cause one to believe. Thus, Flint36 states that "the presence of coagula may occasion an endocardial murmur, but as a rule it is wanting, probably in consequence of the enfeebled action of the heart." Richardson37 holds an analogous opinion, and writes: "There are sometimes abnormal sounds, but it is difficult to distinguish these from murmurs the results of valvular lesions." Walshe38 is at variance with this view, especially in regard to the thrombal de novo murmur, and has "heard such a murmur when the examination post-mortem showed the fibrinous coagulum as the only probable cause of it."
36 Disease of the Heart, Philada., 1870, p. 280.
37 The Coagulation of the Blood, Lond., 1858, p. 428.