The pathological changes in pericarditis are such that it is quite impossible to determine by the special signs or symptoms of the affection between simple pericarditis and a pericarditis the result of transmission from diseases in adjacent organs, as pleurisy or pneumonia, or as a complication of rheumatism or Bright's disease, except by the history and the general features of the case. Yet the prognosis is vastly different. The prognosis of simple pericarditis without carditis is good. Pericarditis in acute articular rheumatism is generally favorable as to life, and is nearly as favorable as simple pericarditis. Balfour18 states that he has records of 1968 cases of disease treated in the Royal Infirmary, 70 of which were cases of acute rheumatism, with but 1 fatal case of rheumatic pericarditis. My general experience of the favorable character of rheumatic pericarditis without marked involvement of the deeper structures of the heart corresponds with this. I except, however, the comparatively rare cases with high temperature. A temperature of 105° is always grave. The prognosis of pericarditis in Bright's disease is, speaking in general terms, as unfavorable as that of the pericarditis of acute rheumatism is favorable. The pericarditis of poisons, of pyæmia, or of scurvy is, as a rule, a very serious malady. In the exanthemata recovery is the rule, unless there be extensive pleurisy or pneumonia as a complication.
18 Op. cit., p. 288.
In injuries, such as in rupture or puncture, the prognosis must depend upon the extent and the character of the injury, the condition of the patient, and whether or not the puncturing body has been removed from the wound. Generally, these must be regarded as unfavorable cases, although paracentesis of the pericardium is now accepted as a proper operation and is attended with comparatively little risk. The cerebral symptoms occurring in pericarditis can hardly in themselves be regarded as unfavorable to life, but they are unfavorable when associated with high temperature and when considered in connection with full recovery of the mental powers. Relapses and recurrences of pericardial attacks have strongly fatal tendencies. Age and sex contribute materially to the prognosis. The very young and the aged are unpromising subjects; and Sibson19 has shown that while females are somewhat more liable than males to acute articular rheumatism, males are more often attacked with rheumatic pericarditis; also that endocarditis accompanies pericarditis more frequently in males than in females, while simple endocarditis is more frequent in the female than in the male. He also shows that while pericarditis affects the two sexes below the age of twenty-one in nearly equal proportions, after the twenty-fifth year males are three times oftener subject to it than females. The disease is greatly modified by occupation as well as by age. Thus, Sibson has pointed out that female domestic servants under twenty-one years of age are extremely prone to acute rheumatic pericarditis, endocarditis, and carditis, as they are often unequal to labor and fatigue, and are easily affected by draughts and by exposure to wet and cold.
19 A System of Medicine, by Reynolds.
The causes of death in pericarditis are various. Death may occur in a few hours after the attack by the rapid effusion of a large quantity of fluid, compressing and causing mechanical paralysis of the heart; or it may happen from syncope due to the patient making sudden exertion, as in getting out of bed, more especially if there be a large amount of fluid in the pericardium; or, again, it may be owing to paralysis of the heart from disturbance of the cardiac centres, or to fatty degeneration of the cardiac walls largely induced by the inflammatory condition. Again, a fatal termination may be caused by pneumonia or extensive congestion of the lungs, or by a large quantity of fluid in the pleura, having its origin really in the pressure exerted on the veins and the other structures by the pericardial effusion; or death may result from non-aëration of the blood and from general exhaustion.
TREATMENT.—In the treatment of acute pericarditis the first thing to insist upon is absolute rest—rest of body, rest of mind; all effort, all fatiguing conversation, is to be avoided. The diet should be of an easily-digested kind, nourishing, but given in small quantities at a time, so as not to distend the stomach. Milk, eggs, animal broths, with occasionally just enough solid food to gratify the wish of the patient, constitute the best diet. Further, from the very outset the cause of the malady should be clearly kept in view and the treatment directed in accordance. As so many cases have their origin in rheumatism, an antirheumatic treatment has usually to be carried out. But here let me at once record the more than uselessness of the salicylates. They have no influence when pericarditis has arisen, and if salicylic acid or its compounds are being given, they should at once be stopped. The alkalies have a far better action. Again, speaking in general terms, opium in moderate doses, to keep the nervous system quiet and to moderate the general discomfort, is of wide applicability and signal use; few are the cases which its steady, judicious employment will not benefit. Especially is this witnessed in the earlier stages and before marked effusion occurs.
The treatment of acute pericarditis is much influenced by the stages of the malady—whether it is seen in the stage with plastic exudation; whether this exudation markedly persist and but little liquid effusion takes place; whether the effusion is copious. Now, in the earlier stages and before decided effusion bloodletting was at one time much in vogue, but it has been by general consent abandoned, at least general bloodletting has. Local bloodletting is still employed by some, and I am sure I have known a few cups to the præcordial region or leeches there applied relieve the pain and make the action of the heart more regular. It is, I think, in robust subjects and in the early stages decidedly to be recommended. Mercurials, like general bloodletting, have fallen into disuse. Cases of pericarditis have been seen to originate in those whose gums were touched by mercury, and it does not prevent effusion. Certainly, in pericarditis with Bright's disease the remedy must not be thought of; but under other circumstances, in lingering cases with extensive plastic deposits, or in effusions that remain uninfluenced, it is worth a trial.
The application of cold to the cardiac region, either in the shape of cold compresses frequently changed or of a bladder of ice, is very much lauded by some of the French and German physicians. Gendrin's method consists in keeping a bladder of ice over the heart for from one to three hours until the pulse and temperature come down to about a normal condition. As these rise it is from time to time reapplied, although for a shorter period; and it is thought to influence both the pain and the inflammation. I have not seen the latter effects from it; and for the pain it is less trustworthy than the more commonly employed hot-water applications and poultices. Digitalis is in the earlier stages an admirable remedy. Its use in small, frequently-repeated doses will render the action of the heart more regular and reduce its frequency. Friedreich20 and Bauer21 both recommend its employment in large doses, to be suspended when the pulse becomes slower or irregular. Notwithstanding it might be thought particularly valuable in marked effusions alike from its tonic action on the heart and its diuretic powers, my clinical experience is against it under such circumstances. It is far inferior to the free use of stimulants.
20 Die Krankheiten des Herzen.
21 "Diseases of the Pericardium," Ziemssen's Cyclop.