215 Zeitsch. f. klin. Med., Bd. i., 1879.

216 Lancet, 1884, ii.

Various attempts have been made to explain the phenomena of the disease, to two or three of which we shall refer:

1st. That the disease is directly dependent upon destruction of the capsules and consequent abnegation of their functions. This was the view of Addison, and it appeared to be supported by the experiments of Brown-Séquard (performed shortly after the publication of Addison's memoir), who held that after extirpation of the glands pigment accumulated in the blood; which he explained on the supposition that their function was the disposal of a material in the blood readily converted into pigment. Subsequent experiments appear to have demonstrated conclusively that, like the spleen, the adrenals are not necessary to life, and that no important changes occur after their removal, or even after the induction of caseous and fibroid induration (Nothnagel). A much stronger argument against this view is found in the fact that cases have been reported in which the capsules presented little or no change.217 Taylor218 held that the pigmentation was induced by destruction of the cortical part of the organs, and the general nervous phenomena by involvement of the central part, which has such close relation with the nerve-structures. This view has again been advanced by B. Fenwick.219

217 Care must be exercised in the examination of apparently normal capsules. There may be extensive small-celled infiltration and destruction of the gland-elements without either reduction or increase in size.

218 Loc. cit.

219 Path. Soc. Trans., xxxiii., 1882.

2d. That it is an affection of the abdominal sympathetic system, induced, most commonly, by capsular disease, but also by other chronic affections which implicate the solar plexus and its ganglia. Addison hinted at this explanation, and had the ganglia examined in one of his cases, but Schmidt of Amsterdam (1859) was the first to point out the possible connection and to record a case. Many corroborative observations have since been made, and this view has the support of the leading authorities. The changes which have been met with are very varied—fibroid thickening of the sheaths with atrophy of the nerve-tubes, fatty degeneration and wasting, excessive pigmentation of the cells, myxomatous degeneration of the stroma of the semilunar ganglia, and in a few instances there have been changes in the spinal cord. The chronic caseo-fibrous process in the capsules seems specially prone to involve contiguous tissues, and the close proximity of the semilunar ganglia renders them more liable to be attacked by the sclerotic process than in other affections in the vicinity, such as aneurism or tumors. According to this view, the symptoms of Addison's disease are to be regarded as the expression of a severe nutrition disturbance caused by a morbid state of the sympathetic ganglia, or, as Semmola puts it, the entire affection, beginning with disturbance of digestion and running its course with asthenia, low temperature, and marked debility in the oxidation and nutritive processes, is a pathological demonstration of the physiological functions of the sympathetic ganglia. The pigmentation may have its origin in changes in the trophic nerves, and the pronounced debility is the outcome of the disturbed chemical activity in the tissue-elements. It is, in short, a disease of the nervous system of organic life. Greenhow, who is a strong advocate for this view, also thinks that the circulatory, respiratory, and digestive symptoms may in part be due to implication of the pneumogastrics, the peripheral branches of which are frequently involved in the thickened tissues about the capsules. The feeble action of the heart, small pulse, the nausea, vomiting, and the gasping respiration, may arise reflexly from irritation of these branches.

There are about thirty cases on record in which changes have been found in the sympathetic system. Riesel220 compares the symptoms of Addison's disease with those which follow extirpation of the semilunar ganglia in animals. There is a paralysis of the vaso-motor nerves of the abdominal viscera, induced either by degeneration of the ganglia or reflexly by irritation, and consequently the blood accumulates in these parts, and there is a corresponding spanæmia of other organs, which explains the weak circulation, anæmia and the heart symptoms, fainting, and loss of energy. Recently this theory has been advocated by F. P. Henry.221

220 Deutsches Archiv f. klin. Med., Bd. vii.