A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 4

by Unknown

Disturbances of Vision caused by Disease of the Sexual Organs.

The eyes and their appendages frequently exhibit the effects of perverted function or diseased conditions of the sexual organs. As might be expected, these ocular effects are most marked in the female, whose generative apparatus is so much more complex and extensive. While it is true that there are thousands of women with grave disease or derangement of these organs who are free from any uncomfortable eye symptoms, still, clinical experience shows that there are crowds of others who present eye lesions due entirely to such causes. Still more frequently do we see some slight optical defect (previously scarcely noticed) become so unbearable that the patient is unfitted for any useful employment. In fact, at most eye hospitals, and still more markedly in private practice, we find an excess of female over male patients. This excess becomes more palpable when we throw out of consideration the large number of male patients who are under treatment for injuries of all sorts the result of mechanical occupations not pursued by females, and the inflammations due to direct exposure to storm, cold, and intense heat.

MENSTRUATION.—When menstruation is profuse its effects are with difficulty distinguished from those of anæmia and loss of blood, but where it is retarded, irregular, or scanty the effects are more readily traced. All surgeons of experience are agreed that it is undesirable to perform operations for cataract or to make iridectomy at the menstrual period, and it is well known that eyes which have been progressing favorably after operations become congested and irritable during the monthly period. In trachomatous eyes retardation of the catamenia often causes the eruption of a fresh crop of granules, while in cases of phlyctenular and interstitial keratitis there are still more frequently relapse and exacerbation of the disease. Vaso-motor disturbances connected with the period of puberty and with that of cessation of the menses are of daily occurrence: we constantly see cases at these epochs where some slight astigmatism or hypermetropia, which has previously given no practical annoyance to the patient, becomes absolutely unbearable. The eyes become watery and sensitive to light; there is marked congestion of the retina with tortuosity of its veins, together with serous infiltration and swelling often sufficient to obscure the margins of the disc. These symptoms frequently entirely disappear when the menses have either become established or have permanently ceased. In some rare cases the symptoms are anomalous and striking: thus the writer has seen vicarious menstruation from the lachrymal caruncle, and a case of pemphigus of the upper lid occurring regularly at each menstrual period for some months. In another patient menstruation came on during the thirteenth year with intense headache, epistaxis, and photophobia, and for a long time afterward there was utter inability to use the eyes for school-work even during the catamenial interval. At almost every menstrual epoch during a period of eight years there has been a recurrence of these symptoms, although they subside sufficiently in the interval to allow the patient to use her eyes for a very limited amount of near work. At the first examination the ophthalmoscope showed that the retinal fibres were swollen and oedematous, hiding the outlines of the discs, while the lymph-sheaths of the retinal vessels at their point of emergence from the disc presented an almost snow-white appearance. The discs and the retinæ have never quite resumed a normal appearance.

Disturbances in the circulation of the eye and its appendages are frequently associated with the menopause. The writer recalls a case where for years there was headache with intense congestion of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, with a fulness and pressure on the orbits at each menstrual period, all these symptoms disappearing with the cessation of the menses. The most striking examples of the influence of the menses on the eyesight are those where the flow has been suddenly checked. Rejecting examples from the older authors, where the want of exact helps to diagnosis might leave room for a different interpretation of the symptoms, we will content ourselves with two examples where the testing of the eyesight and the ophthalmoscopic examination were made by skilled observers. Thus, Mooren—to whom we are indebted for a careful discussion of the relations between uterine disease and disturbances of sight—recites¹⁰⁹ the case of a peasant-woman aged twenty-three years who had complete stoppage of the menstrual flow from exposure to wet during the catamenial period: this was accompanied by high fever and delirium, with pain in the region of the right ovary. When these symptoms subsided, she noticed that there was absolute loss of sight in the right eye, and so great a diminution of it on the left that she could only distinguish movements of the hand. The ophthalmoscope showed in the right side a multiple detachment of the retina, and on the left an intense neuro-retinitis. Rest in bed, inunctions of mercurial ointment, and cataplasms over the region of the ovaries, with leeches to the septum of the nose and the neck of the uterus, gradually brought about amelioration of the symptoms, with restoration of the eyesight in the left eye. As might be expected, the retinal detachment and consequent loss of vision in the right eye remained permanent. In confirmation of this case, but in contrast with it as regards the retinal symptoms, is the one related by Samelsohn.¹¹⁰ The patient (a peasant-girl) by standing in a cold running brook while at work had her menses suddenly stopped. There was no marked uterine or abdominal pain. The patient complained of a feeling of pressure on the orbits, and experienced a gradual failure of sight with contraction of the field of vision. In five days there was absolute amaurosis of both eyes (no sensation of light and no phosphenes to be obtained by pressure). The sight gradually returned in each eye, this being preceded by a copious flow of tears, so that in sixteen days the patient could read small print fluently. In seven weeks the menses returned. There were no ophthalmoscopic symptoms: each eye, both during the attack and subsequent to it, showed only striation of the retina and tortuosity of its veins, the calibre of the retinal arteries being unchanged. Unfortunately, any pupillary changes that might have been recognized were annihilated by previous instillation of atropine into the eye. In the first case there was every probability in favor of a serous effusion into the subarachnoidal and the intravaginal spaces. The latter case is more difficult to explain: if it were due to orbital or intracranial neuritis, why should there not have been some ophthalmoscopic changes during the time that the patient was under observation? If to effusion within the cranium or to local circulatory disturbances in either the corpora quadrigemina or the occipital lobes, why were there not other symptoms of intracranial disturbance?

¹⁰⁹ Arch. f. Augenheilkunde, Bd. x., 1881.

¹¹⁰ Berliner klin. Wochenschrift, Jan., 1878, pp. 27-30.

In further illustration of the effects of a stoppage of menstruation, Mooren¹¹¹ cites the case of a peasant-woman aged thirty-one who had complete suppression of the menses after the birth of her fourth child, and where subsequently an almost continuous headache, dimness of vision, and eventually epileptiform attacks, followed. The ophthalmoscope showed a double neuritis so intense as to lead to the supposition of a possible cerebral tumor. Mercurial inunctions with seton to the back of the neck were resorted to without result. Emmenagogues also failed to give relief. An examination of the uterus was now made, which showed great enlargement and hyperplasia, especially of its mouth and neck, for which scarifications and sitz-baths were employed with good result. The headache and epileptoid attacks disappeared, and the vision improved so far that the patient (who when admitted to the hospital could only decipher Jaeger No. xviii.) could read fluently Jaeger No. iii.

¹¹¹ Loc. cit., p. 551.

DISPLACEMENTS OF THE UTERUS.—Anteflexion and retroversion of the uterus are frequent causes of retinal hyperæsthesia. In this connection we may quote from the same author two cases, as showing how slight mechanical irritations of the uterus may cause eye disturbance—one where a patient had an episcleritis and a chronic metritis with malposition of the uterus, in whom there was an exacerbation of the ciliary neuralgia and of the local eye inflammation every time that the ulcerated os uteri was cauterized or a pessary introduced; and a second with an adhesive kolpitis, in whom the introduction of a pessary caused unpleasant feelings about the head and oppression in the cardiac region, accompanied on two separate occasions by capillary hemorrhages into the retina, all of these symptoms disappearing rapidly after the removal of the pessary. Mooren¹¹² has also seen a double neuro-retinitis caused by retroversion of the uterus. The sight was so much impaired that the patient could with difficulty decipher Jr. No. xx.; but it was entirely regained within a few months after the uterus had been replaced in its proper position. No other treatment was employed.