As the nutrition of the child improved, it was found that the curious positions could be produced by word of command as well as by manipulation. In short, within six weeks after the first manifestations of this disorder, as a usual thing the little patient ate, slept, and played as a normal child should do, but could at any time be thrown into this cataleptoid state. Her one dominant idea apparently was to maintain the position in which she had been placed. She was often turned into some constrained posture, and all attendants absented themselves from the room and left her to her own devices; but no attempt on her part was made to in any way change her attitude. If at dinner-time a bowl of broth was placed before the patient, she would begin to eat with great relish, but if the spoon was taken away and her hands raised over her head, they would so remain, the child making no effort to return to her meal, although the bowl stood before her and all watchers again retired from the room. This experiment was suggested by H. C. Wood, who examined the child with me. To show how completely her consciousness was occupied with one idea of maintaining any position in which she had been placed, the following additional experiments may be quoted: If she was put into a sitting position, as in the act of supplication, with her hands folded and arms extended, and then given a sudden push sufficient to overthrow her equilibrium, the arms would be quickly and intuitively thrown out to protect her from the impending fall, but, the fall accomplished, they would as quickly be returned to their former position. If a heated silver spoon was gradually brought in contact with her extended hand, an expression of pain would pass the child's face, perhaps a cry escape her, and the injured member be rapidly withdrawn, but again almost immediately returned to its original place. It seemed as if the idea of fixity in a certain position which occupied the child's mind was suddenly disturbed by another outside impression, but, being dominant, it quickly drove away the intruder and the former state was restored. At this time the phenomena noted were somewhat in accord with those induced by the mesmeric process, inasmuch as the consciousness seemed largely given up to the one impression operating at that time—i.e. the maintenance of certain fixed positions. Unlike this condition, however, the readiness to receive new impressions, and the complete abeyance of those senses not operating was wanting, for, as seen above, the new impression only for a moment disturbed the child's one idea, to which she quickly returned; nor was there any true absence of sensibility, as was evidenced by the result from touching her with a heated spoon.

As time wore on, a new phase of this condition became evident. The induced manifestations seemed to act the part of some amusement to the child, and the complete absence of volition which had been an early characteristic phenomenon was not now so marked a feature. Thus, if, after the experimenter had for a time moulded and twisted the child into various shapes, he would suddenly leave the room, the little subject would cry lustily, as a child does when suddenly deprived of its playthings, although, curiously enough, no matter how hard she cried, she would not release herself from the last position in which she had been left. Often during any series of observations that were being made it was noted that a faintly-amused look played about her lips, which speedily gave way to a fit of crying when the performance stopped. The hand which, when formerly placed in any position, remained a perfectly motionless and passive object, was now seen slightly to change its place, move the fingers, or the like—an observation first made by A. K. Meigs while examining the patient. The house-physician, Nathan P. Grimm, took great care and interest in observing the case.

De Schweinitz, in reporting the case, briefly discusses the probable cause of the phenomena exhibited. He discards the views that either fear of the experimenter, such as is shown by a trained animal, or the partial blindness of the child, was responsible for the manifestations. He believes that a direct relation existed between the phenomena and the state of the child's nutrition. The more run down her system was, the more nearly did the nervous phenomena resemble those of true catalepsy. Evidently, her symptoms were partly cataleptic and partly phenomena of automatism at command, similar to those which have been observed in hypnotic experiments, and which will be alluded to later.

Catalepsy is of more frequency in the female than in the male sex, but the statistics are not sufficient to give any exact ratio.

The periods of puberty and early menstruation and of pregnancy furnish the most favorable opportunities for the development of cataleptoid seizures in predisposed individuals. In 3 of 10 cases observed by Landouzy catalepsy appeared to be developed in consequence of the sudden suppression of menstruation; in a fourth it occurred in a young girl after a dysmenorrhœa with chronic phlegmasia of the genitals. Masturbation is sometimes mentioned as a cause, particularly in boys.

Reflex irritation undoubtedly often acts as an exciting cause of catalepsy. Preputial irritation, relieved in part by circumcision, was present in the case of Lloyd, and has been noted by others. Handfield Jones mentions a case, recorded by Austen in his work on General Paralysis, in which the cataleptic seizure was, to all appearances, due to fecal accumulations. The attack disappeared promptly after an enema had thoroughly operated.

Briquet believed that catalepsy, when it did not follow upon organic disease, was ordinarily the result of moral causes, such as vivid and strong emotions—fear, chagrin, indigestion, anger, or profound and prolonged meditation. He refers to the able and curious thesis of Favrot,6 who states that in twenty cases in which the causes of the malady were indicated it had been always the result of a moral affection. A magistrate insulted at his tribunal, seized with indignation, is suddenly taken with catalepsy, etc. According to Puel, its causes are always depressing moral affections, as chagrin, hatred, jealousy, and terror at bad treatment. Unrequited love is set down as a cause, but what has not unrequited love produced? Jones mentions a case which occurred in a man sixty years old on the sudden death of his wife.

6 “De la Catalepsie”—Mémoire couronné par l'Académie de Médecine, Mémoires de l'Académie de Médecine, Paris, 1856, t. xx. p. 409, A. 526.

Cullen believed that catalepsy was always a simulated disease; he preferred, therefore, to place it as a species of apoplexy. Temporary catalepsy may, according to Rosenthal, be produced in hysterical patients by covering their eyes with their hands or a cloth. Malaria has been charged with the production of catalepsy, and apparently properly. Traumatism is another of its well-authenticated causes. Blows upon the head have been particularly recorded as having an etiological relation to this disorder.