A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 5

by Unknown

The hand and the foot are the parts most frequently and most completely affected, but one or the other may be partially or wholly spared, though the latter is rare. The muscles of the limbs nearer the trunk may be less affected, so that the patient may make shoulder or pelvis movements when asked to move hand or foot. In severe cases even the scapular movements may be paralyzed. The muscles of the trunk are but slightly affected, though Broadbent states that a difference in the abdominal muscles on the two sides may be perceived as the patient rises from a chair. The respiratory movements are alike on the two sides. A woman in the hospital service of the writer had a quite complete left hemiplegia at about the seventh month of pregnancy. There was some return of motion at the time of her confinement. None of the attendants could perceive any difference in the action of the abdominal muscles of the two sides, although, of course, the usual bracing of the hand and foot upon the left side was wanting. The pains were, however, generally inefficient, and she was delivered by turning. Muscular weakness often exists, and in some cases the non-paralyzed side shows a diminution of power.

The sphincters of the bladder and rectum frequently, and in severe cases almost invariably, lose their activity for a time. It is possible, however, that in some cases of alleged inability to retain urine and feces the defect is really mental, and akin to the dirty habits of the demented. The involuntary muscles probably take no part in hemiplegia, with the very important exception of the muscular coats of the arteries, which apparently share to a certain extent, and sometimes the iris.

Speech may be attempted, and the words be correct, so far as they can be understood, though the patient is apt to confine his remarks to the shortest possible answering of questions. It is, however, thick and indistinct, since the muscles of the tongue and lips are but imperfectly under the control of the will. This condition may be connected with paralysis of either side, and is to be sharply distinguished from aphasia or mental inability to select the proper word or to determine the necessary movements for its pronunciation. Aphasia is almost invariably connected with paralysis of the right side, and will be minutely spoken of hereafter. There is, of course, nothing to prevent the coexistence of the two conditions, but aphasia cannot well be shown to exist until we have reason to suppose, first, that the patient has ideas to express, and secondly, that the paralysis of the muscles of the lips and tongue has more or less completely disappeared. The patient may indistinctly mumble a word which, however, can be understood to be appropriate to the occasion (defective articulation, glosso-labial paralysis), or, on the other hand, pronounce with distinctness an entire wrong word or a number of sounds without meaning (aphasia).

Sensibility—that is, ordinary cutaneous sensation—and, so far as we can judge, the special senses, are not greatly affected after the deep coma has passed off, but exceptions to this rule will be noted later.

Having described this most typical but not most common form of cerebral hemorrhage—that is, the form in which both lesion and symptoms are most distinct and can be most clearly connected—we have a point of departure for conditions less clearly marked and less easily explained.

It is probable that cerebral hemorrhage is much less likely than cerebral embolism to take place without any disturbance of consciousness or abnormal sensations; but there can also be little doubt that a certain amount of paralysis is often accompanied by no other symptoms, and post-mortem appearances often show the remains of small hemorrhages which have passed unnoticed or are lightly estimated. It is highly probable that small hemorrhages may give rise to symptoms which pass for only a little accidental vertigo or a slight feeling of faintness, until a later and more serious attack gives a more definite explanation.

On the other hand, we have a set of cases in which all the symptoms of cerebral hemorrhage may be present without the lesion. Many of these are of course due to embolism, which will be considered later; but besides this condition, recognized as softening for many years, we find described under the head of simple, congestive, serous, and nervous apoplexy cases where sudden or rapid loss of consciousness occurs with general muscular relaxation, which, when fatal, show nothing beyond changes in the circulation—i.e. in the amount of blood in the cerebral vessels or of serum in the meshes of the pia or at the base of the brain.

Besides these, there are cases of temporary unconsciousness with complete recovery—the coup de sang of the French, or rush of blood to the head, which are attributed to congestion of the brain—a theory difficult to prove or disprove, but not in itself unreasonable. Trousseau, without denying the possibility, or even probability, of such a condition, says that which has been called apoplectiform cerebral congestion is in the greater number of cases an epileptic or eclamptic accident, sometimes a syncope. Simple epileptic vertigoes, vertigoes connected with a bad condition of the stomach or diseases of the ear, are wrongly considered as congestions of the brain. He speaks of various conditions, such as violent attacks of whooping cough, the expulsive efforts of women in labor, the congested faces of laborers under heavy burdens, to show that cerebral congestion does not give rise to an apoplectiform attack; and it is undoubtedly true that, as a rule, no long-continued attack is the result; but it must be within the personal experience of almost every one that decided cerebral disturbance is produced for a few moments by such efforts, as, for instance, blowing a fire with the head down. Besides this, a laborer under a heavy load is presumably healthy and accustomed to his work, so that his arteries may be supposed capable of maintaining a due balance between arterial and venous blood in the brain; and, again, although the ordinary efforts of women in labor do not cause unconsciousness, puerperal convulsions, involving a longer period of violent muscular action, may do so, and even give rise to hemiplegia.

Whatever name we may adopt for the temporary cases which recover, there are others, and fatal ones, which are not explained by any change in nomenclature. Epilepsy may, it is true, occur under such circumstances that no convulsion is observed, but, on the other hand, convulsions may accompany not only an attack of unconsciousness, but actual cerebral hemorrhage.

Cases of sudden death with no discoverable lesion furnish abundant opportunity and temptation for conjecture, and it is well known that too much dependence must not be placed upon the post-mortem appearances as to the amount of blood in the brain before death, and probably just as little upon the amount of serum, except as indicating a condition of atrophy.