The act of speaking, according to Kussmaul,38 consists in three stages or processes: the preparation in the intelligence and feelings of the matter to be uttered; the diction, or the formation of the words internally, together with their syntax; the articulation, or formation of words outwardly, irrespective of their connection with one another in the matter spoken. Defects in the first condition have already been spoken of. In the entire absence of mind, as in the deepest apoplexy, aphasia can hardly be said to exist, and it is only later that it becomes manifest. If the second stage is defective, amnesic aphasia exists, and if the third, ataxic. In the great majority of cases of aphasia the loss of memory is the most important factor; and as this exists whatever be the mode in which it is desired to express the idea, amnesic aphasia is accompanied by agraphia. In those cases, however, in which the patient retains a few words, they are not always the same for speech and writing. Occasionally an instance is found where a person can write perfectly well and possesses complete intelligence, but is unable to speak a word. This is pure ataxic aphasia, and is certainly rare. An ataxic agraphia is less easy to detect, since the aphasic patient is likely to be paralyzed upon the right side, and thus unable to write, even if he remembers the words, until educated upon the left side.
38 Ziemssen's Cyclopædia.
There are many degrees and kinds of amnesic aphasia, and, in fact, every case is a study by itself. The slightest might be called physiological; at any rate, it is sufficiently common among people supposed to be well, and consists in the failure to recollect in time for use the name, most frequently of a person, but sometimes of a thing, which is really well known, is recognized at once if suggested, and perhaps returns spontaneously at a later period. Another person may forget only some words which are not recalled at any time, or parts of words. A man appeared among the out-patients at St. Bartholomew's Hospital who had his name written on a piece of paper, because he could not say it, but could carry on a long conversation. There were a few other words he could not say. The more complete cases have no vocabulary at all, or only a few words or syllables applied to all purposes, and perhaps an exclamation or two. In these cases the patient may know perfectly well that he is not expressing his ideas, and he may recognize perfectly well the word when it is told to him or reject a wrong one. If he be, as happens in nearly all cases, unable to pronounce the word after he has recognized it as the one he wished for, there is a combination of ataxic and amnesic aphasia. Incorrect or deficient words may be corrected or supplemented by gestures or intonation. “Yes” may do duty without confusion for “yes” or “no,” according to the tone.
Oaths may be retained, and sometimes an exclamation may be uttered with perfect propriety of application which cannot be repeated deliberately a moment afterward. This emotional use of words may be considered akin to the movement executed by paralyzed limbs under the stimulus of a movement taking place elsewhere, and may lead to an erroneous prognosis of recovery. This curious fact, that more or less automatic expressions are possible when deliberately-willed pronunciation is not, is a probable explanation for the observation which has occasionally been made that an aphasic patient is able to sing words which he cannot speak.
Paraphasia is the use of the wrong words, or of phrases which carry an entirely different meaning from that intended, as when Trousseau's patient receives a guest with politeness and invites her to be seated with the words “cochon, animal, fichue bête,” or an old paralytic, when a lady declines to drive with him, answers with great suavity, “It don't make any damnation to me whether you go or not.”
Word-blindness is more common than word-deafness, and is a frequent accompaniment of aphasia. Rostan, the well-known author of the work on softening of the brain, experienced an attack of aphasia lasting a few hours. The symptom which first attracted his attention was the inability to understand the book, by no means abstruse, which he was reading. He was, however, able carefully to observe his own symptoms, and made signs to be bled, which operation was followed by relief.
Gouty aphasia has been described in a man aged thirty-seven who on several occasions became aphasic, with recovery in a short time. This condition was connected with localized paralysis, and once with entire right hemiplegia. Afterward it was accompanied by convulsions. In the intervals the patient was in fair health.39 It is difficult to imagine the lesion in this case. The reporter speaks of “sudden blocking by a gouty thrombus,” but nothing is known of any thrombus which can disappear so rapidly. Ball40 describes twelve attacks of aphasia occurring within nine months, and accompanied by slight paresis and convulsive movements in the right hand. The patient suffered habitually from migraine. He supposes the cause to have been a temporary anæmia.
39 Brit. Med. Journ., Aug. 28, 1880.
40 L'Encephale, 1883, 2.
Aphasia may be entirely unconnected with motor paralysis, and is then likely to be of shorter duration, though just as complete. Most of these cases probably do not depend upon a lesion of the same kind as when aphasia is only one of several severe symptoms. It shows how delicate a function of the brain memory for words may be, and is possibly the result of a temporary malnutrition or a change in the vascular supply. It has been observed in various conditions of debility and after acute disease. Rostan was diabetic. It has been seen after chloroform narcosis, after santonin (5 cgr.), after fright, and is said to be one of the ordinary symptoms after the bite of venomous serpents. Aphasia and paraphasia may be met with in thorough bromization, and, naturally enough, may be part of the symptomatology of general paralysis. In other cases, even when it is the principal symptom, it depends upon an organic lesion, and is not infrequently the precursor of a more fully-developed attack. The diagnosis is of great importance, and other traces of paralysis should be carefully sought for. This symptom is far more common with occlusion of the vessels than with hemorrhage, though not unknown with the latter.41