everlastinge presence, than in temporal tyme it was nat; in
205
†eterne tyme, in eterne presence shal it nat be. Than no reson
defendeth, that somthing ne may be in tyme temporal moving,
that in eterne is immovable. Forsothe, it is no more contrary
ne revers for to be movable in tyme temporel, and [im]movable
in eternitè, than nat to be in any tyme and to be alway in
210
eternitè; and to have be or els to come in tyme temporel, and
nat have be ne nought comming to be in eternitè. Yet never-the-later,