Just one more word. There has been an enormous amount said the last few years on heredity, and there is a great deal of feeling that there is a great deal due to heredity. The study is very interesting, scientifically very important, but the only attitude we should assume is to practically throw out of consideration the whole question of inheritance. If you are going to say this fellow has got a certain disease, and you are going to conclude it is inherited, that is a fatalistic diagnosis and the tendency of the diagnosis is to hamstring any effort that may be made in his behalf. The only way we can find out the percentage of salvageable material is to endeavor to make the adjustment. If we put them down as hereditary, our inclination will be to throw them out of the possibility of consideration. We should rather stress the possibilities to the utmost and find some solution or partial solution of a great many of these problems.
DR. CHRONQUEST (U.S.P.H.S.): So much has been said that I shall not go on with the problem. I would mention the Compensation side. I have been wondering for some time, especially among the neuroses, if by our present system of compensation we are not tending to make crystallized neuroses. I do not pretend to answer the question. Take, for example, a chap who has been in the service, who has done good work, whose social scale has not been high, whose life prior to service has been, as you might say, from hand to mouth. He has come out of the service with a definite, known disability acquired by service. By being hospitalized he has been compensated justly by the Government; he has received the treatment to which he is entitled; but during the days of his treatment he has found that he is able to get along more easily under these conditions than he did prior to service, and decides that one of the best ways he can make a living is by Compensation. I do not say that that is true with all, but it is with some of the cases.
I have wondered whether or not our present system of compensation to that type of individual was the best, or whether the system of Canada or England would be better. In other words, they do not put a premium on a man to go to a hospital. If I am correct, a man gets less money when he goes into a hospital than when he is out. It is my meagre opinion that in that type of neurosis, he would tend to fight harder as an individual to put himself back into a financial, gainful pursuit; and with the advantages the Government offers him now, especially through rehabilitation, I feel he could be put on a much better adjustment than he was before.
Another point which has recently come to the attention of us locally is the question of guardianship; and I am going to ask Dr. Guthrie if it is a known fact that two men in the same hospital, with the same disease—that one will draw his compensation without a guardian, the other is required to have one.
DR. GUTHRIE: It was our understanding that a man who is a psychotic by reason of service should at least have a guardian. If that is not true, I suggest to the Hospital Committee that it is a point for consideration, as it puts the man in the field between the devil and the deep, blue sea.
DR. W. A. WHITE: I think the man who has a guardian has one usually because his people have applied for such. I believe the Bureau never relinquishes the right to control of the funds, and is not obliged to pay the funds to the guardian. Legally the patient can be paid if he is competent.
DR. CHRONQUEST: In looking over histories of cases that come to West Roxbury and information received, I believe that a point that would be of help to the service as a whole is the getting of accurate histories. We find patients being transferred to N.P. hospitals, who have a diagnosis which is not correct according to the past histories taken, due to the fact that careful search has not been made in gathering the facts of the men’s disabilities. At times it may be the fault of the examining physician. It may be the fault of the social service department. Again, it may be the fault of the individual, or of the family itself in trying to protect the patient in question. I believe that those errors, which are seen every once in a while, should be overcome; and I feel that all of us, whether Neuro-psychiatrists or not, who have anything to do with either neuroses or psychoses, should be extremely careful of the histories and get them complete, detailed and accurate.
COLONEL MATTISON: (acting for General Geo. Wood) The Tuberculosis Section has to deal with a group of patients,—the largest group that the Veterans’ Bureau has to handle. I am sure that we have many men here who are interested in this subject, and I hope we shall have a very free discussion of the subject. We shall begin by having each subject opened, and then the program will be given to general discussion. We shall ask Dr. Stites to open the session on “The Segregation of Cases”.
SURGEON T. H. A. STITES (R) U.S.P.H.S.: This question of segregation of Tubercular cases is one that has been vexing all of us for a long while. To understand it at all we have got to review the history of T.B.,—from the ancient times when T.B. was looked upon as a sort of visitation from Heaven, and looked upon as a disgrace to the family, on down to the period when Koch, with his great discovery, found the disease to be infectious. During that time there came on an organized propaganda for the control of T.B. upon the ground that any infectious disease is a preventable disease. This propaganda, as is true of all propaganda, ran to an extreme. It was so hard for those interested in proving that T.B. was an infectious disease to impress it upon the public and to compel them to accept the proposition of its infectiousness, that we went to the extreme of leading everybody to the idea that it was a virulent infection; that it was as contagious possibly as some of the acute infections like scarlatina.
There were those who believed that every case should be sent to a T.B. hospital, absolutely isolated from his family and the world in general. Then the pendulum began to swing back, and we came to a sensible conclusion,—that while T.B. is an infectious disease, it is only slightly so to the adult; and if virulent at all, it is so only among children and the adolescent. This being so, we had to change from the separate and isolated hospital for T.B. It has been accepted that every general hospital should receive its quota of T.B. patients, T.B. being one of the most common forms of illness, and that in sending out patients to a strictly T.B. hospital; they should be sent only after the presence of the disease has been fully well proven.