A British ringed gannet from Ailsa Craig (55°12'N, 5°07'W) was found nesting when 4 years old in the Nordmjele colony in 1970 (Brun 1972), giving direct evidence that immigration from colonies in Great Britain (Scotland) still takes place.

Table 5. Status of the common murre (Uria aalge) in Norway (cf. Fig. 2).
LocalityLast censusPrevious censusReference
YearNo. of breeding pairsYearNo. of breeding pairs
1.Utsira19701195010Holgersen 1951
2.Utvær197017194855Willgohs 1952
3.Veststeinen197029195040Willgohs 1952
4.Klovningen197035195020Willgohs 1952
5.Einevarden197030195225Willgohs 1955
6.Runde19746,00019637,600Brun 1969a
7.Storholmen19708
8.Røst19746,80019649,700Brun 1969a
9.Værøy19741,75019642,400Brun 1969a
10.Nykvåg19743501966430Brun 1969a
11.Bleik197460195290Regnell 1957
196475Brun 1969a
12.Sør-Fugløy197410194010,000Soot-Ryen 1941
19614,000Brun 1963
19661,100Brun 1969a
13.Nord-Fugløy19679,000196315,000Lütken 1965
14.Loppa19745001966800Brun 1969a
15.Hjelmsøy197470,0001964110,000Brun 1965
196795,000Brun 1969a
16.Gjesværstappene19735801967750Brun 1969a
17.Sværholtklubben197320196625Brun 1969a
18.Omgangsstauran197370196785Brun 1969a
19.Syltefjorden19749,000196612,300Brun 1969a
20.Hornøy19745001964730Brun 1969a
21.Reinøy19741101964160Brun 1969a
22.Kjøfjord197021
23.Skogerøy1970819676Brun 1969a
24.Sagfjord19709196712Brun 1969a
25.Kobbholmfjorden1970219671Brun 1969a

Estimates of Total Seabird Population in Norway

In addition to the more detailed censuses of the cliff-breeding species dealt with so far, notes have been made on all seabirds observed during numerous flights along the Norwegian coast. Although a first attempt at putting a figure to all seabird species in Norway may be somewhat premature, it is believed that even an extrapolation combined with an educated guess is of some value until more accurate censuses covering the whole coast can be made. Although the data (Table 1) are arranged in the same way as the results from "Operation Seafarer" in the British Isles (Cramp et al. 1974), it must be stressed that the accuracy of the Norwegian figures, at least for the non-cliff-breeding birds, is far inferior to the very fine British data. The table includes data for two petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus, Oceanodroma leucorrhoa), which in Norway breed on Røst (well north of the Arctic Circle), where they have adapted to a delayed breeding season with egg laying in August because of the conflict of their nocturnal habits with the continuous daylight due to the midnight sun. Of the present population trends that are given for each species in Table 1, all auks except the black guillemot (Cepphus grylle) are decreasing, whereas the gulls, the gannets, and the fulmars are increasing.

Table 6. Population trends in colonies of the common murre (Uria aalge) in Norway. Numbers for 1964 and 1974 are, when not censused those years, extrapolated from present trends, using estimated yearly decrease or increase from all available census figures.
LocalityNumber of breeding pairs[77]Percentage yearly decrease (-) or increase (+)
19641974
1.Utsira21-12.2
2.Utvær2314-5.5
3.Veststeinen3227-1.6
4.Klovningen3039+2.8
5.Einevarden2831+1.0
6.Runde7,4386,000-2.2
7.Storholmen97(-2.2)[78],[79]
8.Røst9,7006,800-3.6
9.Værøy2,4001,750-3.2
10.Nykvåg453350-2.6
11.Bleik7560-2.3
12.Sør-Fugløy1,84410-68.5
13.Nord-Fugløy13,2013,681-13.6
14.Loppa900500-6.1
15.Hjelmsøy110,00070,000-4.6
16.Gjesværstappen853556-4.4
17.Sværholtklubben2719-3.2
18.Omgangsstauran9468-3.3
19.Syltefjorden13,2999,000-4.0
20.Hornøy730500-3.9
21.Reinøy160110-3.8
22.Kjøfjord2120(-0.4)[78],[79]
23.Skogerøy512+10.1
24.Sagfjord166-10.1
25.Kobbholmfjord15+26.0
Total161,34199,566-4.9
Table 7. Status of the thick-billed murre (Uria lomvia) in Norway (cf. Fig. 3).
LocalityYearNo. of breeding pairsPercentage of total Uria population
1.Vedøy, Røst1974150.3
2.Værøy1966200.9
3.Hjelmsøy19748501.2
4.Gjesværstappene1973254.3
5.Syltefjord1970900.9
6.Hornøy1966558.1
7.Reinøy196410.6
8.Kjøfjord197014.8
Estimated number, Norway, 1974>1,000ca. 1.0
Table 8. Status of the razorbill (Alca torda) in Norway (cf. Fig. 4).
LocalityYearNo. of breeding pairsPercent
1.Kjør19701<0.1
2.Utsira1970250.1
3.Utvær1970160.1
4.Veststeinen1970220.1
5.Klovningen197012<0.1
6.Einevarden1970450.2
7.Runde19742,8009.5
8.Sklinna1974150.1
9.Lovunden19688<0.1
10.Røst19743,90013.2
11.Værøy19748002.7
12.Nykvåg19662500.8
13.Bleik1968280.1
14.Sør-Fugløy1974150.1
15.Nord-Fugløy196710,00033.8
16.Loppa19697502.5
17.Hjelmsøy19747,00023.7
18.Gjesvær19732,5008.5
19.Sværholtklubben1973180.1
20.Omgangsstauran19736<0.1
21.Kongsøy19668<0.1
22.Syltefjorden19661,2004.1
23.Hornøy1967650.2
24.Reinøy1967550.2
25.Kjøfjord19709<0.1
26.Skogerøy19704<0.1
27.Jarfjordnes19703<0.1
Totalca. 30,000

Since the coastline of Norway is about the same length as the coastline of Great Britain and Ireland, it is interesting to compare the population figures (Table 12), although the accuracy is very different. Populations of auks and gulls are similar in both areas, but the species composition is different. There are more terns in the British Isles, but skuas (Catharacta skua), shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis), and great cormorants (P. carbo) are present in similar numbers. The most striking difference is the very small number of procelli-forms and gannets in Norway compared to Britain and Ireland, where they are almost as numerous as the gulls and the auks.

CountyNumber of localitiesNumber of breeding pairs
Nordland6140
Møre and Romsdal7945
Sogn and Fjordane211
Rogaland22
Total171,098