With one exception (G.), the subjects found Movements I., movements in the direction in which the object had been moved, easier than Movements II. In Movements II. the eye seemed to construct and compel the motion, which was not the case with Movements I., in which the eye followed the motion. The distance to which the image went in Movements I. seemed predetermined, and these movements seemed exact copies of the original movement of the object, being purely reminiscent and reproducing its irregularities when there were any. Also, the image was usually seen in transitu both out and back, which was never the case with Movements II. Eye movement and enunciation were much less frequent and the image was more vivid and distinct in Movements I.
FOOTNOTES.
[1] Gallon, Francis: 'Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development,' London, 1883, p. 109.
[2] Bentley, I.M.: 'The Memory Image and its Qualitative Fidelity,' Am. Journ. of Psychol., 1899, XI., pp. 1-48.
[3] Ladd, G.T.: 'Direct Control of the Retinal Field,' PSYCH. REV., 1894, L, pp. 351-355.
[4] French, F.C.: PSYCH. REVIEW, 1902, IX., p. 40.