THE INFLUENCE OF THE Position OF THE Series OF Visual IMPRESSIONS
It was noticed in the series of the three letters, particularly, that some observers were much more accurate in their work when the click was near one end of the series. In this experimental group, the comparison is between cases where the click is coördinated with (1) the first member of a visual series of five, (2) the middle member of a series of five, and (3) the last of such a series. The method was the same as that used in obtaining the results of Table IV. H was the letter used in each case for coördination. Results follow in Table V.
TABLE V
| Obs. | H first | H middle | H last | |||
| A | Threshold Mean After Letter | .010 (sec.) | After Letter | .021 (sec.) | After Letter | .025 (sec.) |
| Range | .072 (sec.) | .085 (sec.) | .093 (sec.) | |||
| G | Threshold Mean Before Letter | .007 (sec.) | On Letter | Before Letter | .007 (sec.) | |
| Range | .124 (sec.) | .083 (sec.) | .151 (sec.) | |||
| R | Threshold Mean After Letter | .032 (sec.) | After Letter | .016 (sec.) | After Letter | .042 (sec.) |
| Range | .464 (sec.) | .398 (sec.) | .369 (sec.) | |||
| Sh | Threshold Mean After Letter | .025 (sec.) | After Letter | .015 (sec.) | After Letter | .030 (sec.) |
| Range | .176 (sec.) | .176 (sec.) | .166 (sec.) | |||
| St | Threshold Mean After Letter | .050 (sec.) | After Letter | .062 (sec.) | After Letter | .078 (sec.) |
| Range | .140 (sec.) | .108 (sec.) | .108 (sec.) |
Under these conditions, whatever the effect of the visual series, if it has any effect, opposite tendencies in direction of displacement ought to be shown in the "H last" from those in the "H first," results, as each is contrasted with "H middle." Contrasted in this way, these results, for A and St, show a relative approach of the mean to zero for "H first," and a relative departure from zero for "H last," or a decrease of a negative displacement for "H first" and an increase of the same for "H last." In other words, the series draws the displacement of the click toward itself. A negative displacement is increased by a series coming before the visual stimulus in question, and decreased by such a series coming after. For R and Sh, the negative displacement is increased in both H first and H last as compared with H middle, but relatively the most for H last in both observers. For G there is the same positive displacement introduced by both H first and H last, but it is less than in any of the other cases. The drift of the evidence here, then, is that the visual series draws the displacement in its own direction. Each observer who has a negative displacement (Threshold mean after) with "H middle" increases this when the series all comes before (H last) and two decrease it when the series comes after (H first).
THE EFFECT OF RHYTHM (Repetition of Auditory and of Both Stimuli)
It is very evident to any one who has worked at all in the complication experiment, that rhythm plays an important part in the displacement. Witness also the astronomers' experience cited above, St's waiting for the rhythm to establish itself, and my own readjustment to the new conditions when a new combination of intervals was given in the experiment with varying auditory intervals. In order to show the part played by rhythm, I tested each one of five observers on several different days, to fix for each of them both the "click first" and the "click last" thresholds, as above, under each of the following conditions: (1) one visual (single letter) and one auditory stimulus (one pair), (2) one visual (single letter) and many auditory stimuli, and (3) many visual (single letter repeated) and many auditory stimuli (many pairs). For visual fixation, the observer had a very dim light at the end of the observation-tube. The visual stimulus was a flash of red in the place thus fixated. It had a total duration of less than .005 sec. The surface exposed subtended a vertical visual angle of about seven tenths of a degree. In the case of one visual and many auditory stimuli, the visual stimulus was given when the observer had heard the recurring auditory stimuli several times and had himself given the "ready" signal. The results follow in Table VI.
TABLE VI
| Obs. | One Pair | One Visual and Many Auditory | Many Pairs | ||||
| A | Threshold Mean | After Letter | .005 (sec.) | After Letter | .022 (sec.) | After Letter | .042 (sec.) |
| Range | .021 (sec.) | .024 (sec.) | .039 (sec.) | ||||
| G | Threshold Mean | After Letter | .022 (sec.) | After Letter | .009 (sec.) | After Letter | .005 (sec.) |
| Range (sec.) | .078 (sec.) | .083 (sec.) | .084 (sec.) | ||||
| H | Threshold Mean | Before Letter | .011 (sec.) | After Letter | .006 (sec.) | After Letter | .012 (sec.) |
| Range | .035 (sec.) | .035 (sec.) | .039 (sec.) | ||||
| Hy | Threshold Mean | After Letter | .034 (sec.) | After Letter | .030 (sec.) | After Letter | .046 (sec.) |
| Range | .089 (sec.) | .074 (sec.) | .072 (sec.) | ||||
| St | Threshold Mean | After Letter | .054 (sec.) | After Letter | .037 (sec.) | After Letter | .041 (sec.) |
| Range | .096 (sec.) | .080 (sec.) | .083 (sec.) |
In this experiment, the observers A, H, and Hy, show an increasing distance of the threshold mean after the visual stimulus, with the successive introductions of the auditory series and the combined series. In other words, the second column negative displacement is larger than that of the first, and the third column has a still larger. G and St are again exceptions, as they would be expected to be from the above analysis of their methods. Each did his most accurate work in a case where there was some rhythm present. St said in regard to this work "the one pair abolishes the sound as a standard." The rhythmic factor most missed by these observers, in the case of the single pair, was the sound; for their results are almost the same in the second and third columns. Introduction of the repetition of the visual series does not make any decided difference. A, H, and Hy were able so to adjust their attention as to get the best results in the case of the single pair. The rhythm seemed to introduce for them a subjective rhythm which upset the nice adjustment of attention and so increased the displacement or the time between the threshold mean and the visual stimulus. The negative displacement was increased under these circumstances, probably as a result of the facilitation of the auditory perceptive process. It has an opened path. It is a case of pre-perception. Even when both were repeated (many pairs) the auditory dominated, and so did the most at opening its path. But it seems more likely to me that the rhythm, as such, whether auditory or auditory and visual, claimed the attention and so proved a distraction from the work of accurately discriminating the times of the impressions. And this exaggerated the displacement or lack of discrimination in whichever direction it was tending before.