SubjectAMNOLP
BONLMP
CPLMNO
DNOPLM
E MLMNP
FOLMNP

We see that individual differences are stronger here than in the geometrical figures, but that the same tendency to react more strongly to the complex is present in nearly every case. This can be brought to the eye more clearly if we observe the table in which is shown the position of the different figures in the series of the different subjects.

Times in
1st place2d place3d place4th place5th place
O 21201
N12030
L03120
M20211
P10104

M here presents the principal exception, coming too often in the first place.

Finally we give the tables for the widths of the curves for the colored figures; and first the table of the averages of all the subjects for all the figures:

LMNOP
SubjectA25.7624.2725.0624.7723.14
B 9.429.499.069.848.11
C5.855.355.625.805.24
D13.6813.5313.1813.2613.38
E22.0621.3722.5022.1720.44
F16.3015.0816.6516.7615.13
93.0789.0992.0792.6085.44
Average 15.5114.8515.3515.4314.24

Order, arranged in a descending series according to width of curve:

LONMP
15.5115.4315.3514.8514.24

Here the order is not just the same as we got from a measurement of the heights. The three complex figures have changed places somewhat, but there is no exchange of a simple and a complex.