IX
Here it is treated of an argument and a judgment that took place in Alexandria
In Alexandria, which is in the parts of Roumania—for there are twelve Alexandrias which [[59]]Alexander founded in the March before he died[1]—in this Alexandria there are streets where the Saracens live, who make foods for sale, and the people seek out the street where the finest and most delicate foodstuffs are to be found, just as among us one goes in search of cloths.
On a certain Monday, a Saracen cook whose name was Fabrae was standing by his kitchen door, when a poor Saracen entered the kitchen with a loaf in his hand. Money to purchase viands he had none, so he held his loaf over the pot, and let the savoury steam soak into it, and ate it.
The Saracen Fabrae, who was doing a poor trade that morning, was annoyed at the action, and seized the poor Saracen, and said to him: pay me for what you have taken of mine.
The poor man answered: I have taken nothing from your kitchen save steam.[2] Pay me for what you have taken of mine, Fabrae continued to exclaim. [[60]]
The dispute over this new and difficult question which had never arisen before, continued to such an extent that news of it reached the Sultan.
Owing to the great novelty of the argument, the Sultan called together a number of wise men. He laid the question before them.
The Saracen wise men began to dispute, and there were those who held that the steam did not belong to the cook, for which they adduced many good reasons. Steam cannot be appropriated, for it dissolves in the air, and has no useful substance or property. Therefore the poor man ought not to pay. Others argued that the steam was still part of the viand cooking, in fact that it belonged to it and emanated from its property, that a man sells the products of his trade, and that it is the custom for him who takes thereof to pay.