LONDON
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET
1890

[All rights reserved]

ESSAYS
AND
CONTRIBUTORS.

  1. Faith.
    1. Rev. H. S. Holland, M.A., Canon of St. Paul's, sometime Senior Student of Christ Church.
  2. The Christian Doctrine of God.
    1. Rev. Aubrey Moore, M.A., Hon. Canon of Christ Church, Tutor of Magdalen and Keble Colleges.
  3. The Problem of Pain: its bearing on faith in God.
    1. Rev. J. R. Illingworth, M.A., Rector of Longworth, sometime Fellow of Jesus and Tutor of Keble Colleges.
  4. The Preparation in History for Christ.
    1. Rev. E. S. Talbot, D.D., Vicar of Leeds, sometime Warden of Keble College.
  5. The Incarnation in relation to Development.
    1. Rev. J. R. Illingworth.
  6. The Incarnation as the Basis of Dogma.
    1. Rev. R. C. Moberly, M.A., Vicar of Great Budworth, sometime Senior Student of Christ Church.
  7. The Atonement.
    1. Rev. and Hon. Arthur Lyttelton, M.A., Master of Selwyn College, Cambridge, sometime Tutor of Keble College.
  8. The Holy Spirit and Inspiration.
    1. Rev. C. Gore, M.A., Principal of Pusey House, Fellow of Trinity College.
  9. The Church.
    1. Rev. W. Lock, M.A., Sub-Warden of Keble and Fellow of Magdalen Colleges.
  10. Sacraments.
    1. Rev. F. Paget, D.D., Canon of Christ Church, and Regius Professor of Pastoral Theology.
  11. Christianity and Politics.
    1. Rev. W. J. H. Campion, M.A., Tutor of Keble College.
  12. Christian Ethics.
    1. Rev. R. L. Ottley, M.A., Vice-Principal of Cuddesdon, late Senior Student of Christ Church.

PREFACE.

1. This volume is primarily due to a set of circumstances which exists no longer. The writers found themselves at Oxford together between the years 1875-1885, engaged in the common work of University education; and compelled for their own sake, no less than that of others, to attempt to put the Catholic faith into its right relation to modern intellectual and moral problems. Such common necessity and effort led to not infrequent meetings, in which a common body of thought and sentiment, and a common method of commending the faith to the acceptance of others, tended to form itself. We, who once enjoyed this happy companionship, are now for the most part separated. But at least some result of our temporary association remains, which it is hoped may justify and explain the present volume.

2. For this collection of essays represents an attempt on behalf of the Christian Creed in the way of explanation. We are sure that Jesus Christ is still and will continue to be the 'Light of the world.' We are sure that if men can rid themselves of prejudices and mistakes (for which, it must be said, the Church is often as responsible as they), and will look afresh at what the Christian faith really means, they will find that it is as adequate as ever to interpret life and knowledge in its several departments, and to impart not less intellectual than moral freedom. But we are conscious also that if the true meaning of the faith is to be made sufficiently conspicuous it needs disencumbering, reinterpreting, explaining. We can but quote in this sense a distinguished French writer who has often acted as an inspiration to many of us. Père Gratry felt painfully that the dogmas of the Church were but as an 'unknown tongue' to many of the best of his compatriots. 'It is not enough,' he said, 'to utter the mysteries of the Spirit, the great mysteries of Christianity, in formulas, true before God, but not understood of the people. The apostle and the prophet are precisely those who have the gift of interpreting these obscure and profound formulas for each man and each age. To translate into the common tongue the mysterious and sacred language ... to speak the word of God afresh in each age, in accordance with both the novelty of the age and the eternal antiquity of the truth, this is what S. Paul means by interpreting the unknown tongue. But to do this, the first condition is that a man should appreciate the times he lives in. "Hoc autem tempus quare non probatis[1]?"'

3. We have written then in this volume not as 'guessers at truth,' but as servants of the Catholic Creed and Church, aiming only at interpreting the faith we have received. On the other hand, we have written with the conviction that the epoch in which we live is one of profound transformation, intellectual and social, abounding in new needs, new points of view, new questions; and certain therefore to involve great changes in the outlying departments of theology, where it is linked on to other sciences, and to necessitate some general restatement of its claim and meaning.

This is to say that theology must take a new development. We grudge the name development, on the one hand, to anything which fails to preserve the type of the Christian Creed and the Christian Church; for development is not innovation, it is not heresy: on the other hand, we cannot recognise as the true 'development of Christian doctrine,' a movement which means merely an intensification of a current tendency from within, a narrowing and hardening of theology by simply giving it greater definiteness or multiplying its dogmas.