[1904]. If we must confine ourselves to one system of notation then there can be no doubt that that which was invented by Leibnitz is better fitted for most of the purposes to which the infinitesimal calculus is applied than that of fluxions, and for some (such as the calculus of variations) it is indeed almost essential.—Ball, W. W. R.
History of Mathematics (London, 1901), p. 371.
[1905]. The difference between the method of infinitesimals and that of limits (when exclusively adopted) is, that in the latter it is usual to retain evanescent quantities of higher orders until the end of the calculation and then neglect them. On the other hand, such quantities are neglected from the commencement in the infinitesimal method, from the conviction that they cannot affect the final result, as they must disappear when we proceed to the limit.—Williamson, B.
Encyclopedia Britannica, 9th Edition; Article “Infinitesimal Calculus,” sect. 14.
[1906]. When we have grasped the spirit of the infinitesimal method, and have verified the exactness of its results either by the geometrical method of prime and ultimate ratios, or by the analytical method of derived functions, we may employ infinitely small quantities as a sure and valuable means of shortening and simplifying our proofs.—Lagrange.
Méchanique Analytique, Preface; Oeuvres, t. 2 (Paris, 1888), p. 14.
[1907]. The essential merit, the sublimity, of the infinitesimal method lies in the fact that it is as easily performed as the simplest method of approximation, and that it is as accurate as the results of an ordinary calculation. This advantage would be lost, or at least greatly impaired, if, under the pretense of securing greater accuracy throughout the whole process, we were to substitute for the simpler method given by Leibnitz, one less convenient and less in harmony with the probable course of natural events....
The objections which have been raised against the infinitesimal method are based on the false supposition that the errors due to neglecting infinitely small quantities during the actual calculation will continue to exist in the result of the calculation.—Carnot, L.
Réflections sur la Métaphysique du Calcul Infinitésimal (Paris, 1813), p. 215.