The Index distinguishes between ‘de Courtenay’ and ‘de Courteney’. However, the latter does not appear in the text. The index is given as printed.
Errors deemed most likely to be the printer’s have been corrected, and are noted here. The references are to the page and line in the original.
| [129.9] | Shall enjoy a Spring for ever![”] | Removed |
| [174.29] | The lettering of the inscripton | Inserted. |
| [183.25] | [“]and,> as a mark of subjection | Removed. |
| [204.32] | Th[e] following notice | Added. |
| [246.20] | vrai r[esé/ése]au | Replaced. |
| [299.20] | de Courteney, John, Abbot of Tavis | Removed. |
| [299.47] | Dickinson, Mr., of Knight | Added. |
Transcriptions of Extended Captions
This Castle, was built by Baldwin de Bronys, & was at first call’d Ochementon; it descended to Rich. de Rivers or Riparus, & from him to his Sister Adeliza, who marrying one of the Courtenays, it came into that Noble family, & so continued til K.E.IV. seized it, for their adherence to the House of Lancaster. K.H. VII. restord it to the Courtenays, but K.H.VIII. again alienated it & dismantled the Castle & Park, yet Ed. Courtenay in Q. Marys Reign obtain’d a Restoration, but he dying without Issue Male, it came by a female into the Mohuns Barons of Mohun & Oakhampton, & by the like failure of ye male it came by marriage to Christopher Harris of Heynes Esqr.
S. & N. Buck, delim et Sculp. 1734.