54 1651, 1653 have 'his' for 'hers'; but 'a double prize' is more vivid if less strictly defensible than 'the beauteous' of 1677. So in 56 1677 opens with 'Seeing each' instead of 'When from'—much feebler. But in 57-8 The text, which is 1677, is better than 1653:
Or can the sight be deaf if she but speak,
A well-tuned face, such moving rhetoric?
which indeed is, if not nonsense, most clumsily expressed, even if comma at 'face' be deleted.
60 and melts] yet melts 1677.
66 'sixt' 1651, 1653, 1677.
70-1 The punctuation of the old texts—no comma at 'flowers' and one at 'hearse'—makes the passage hard to understand. As I have altered this punctuation, it is clear.
73 what Divines] 1651, 1653, &c. 'with Divines'.
75 come now 1677: come, come 1651, 1653.
83 square] squared 1677. If all this is not burlesque it is very odd.