[1029] Cf. Field, no. 1612.
[1030] Ruines, etc., 261, and Viollet le Duc, p. 74; Anciens Villes, ch. 24.
[1031] There is a Rapport sur les ruines, by Doutrelaine, in the Archives de la Commission Scientifique du Méxique (vol. iii.); Nadaillac (p. 364) and Short (p. 361) have epitomized results, and Louis H. Aymé gives some Notes on Mitla in the Amer. Antiq. Soc. Proc., April, 1882, p. 82; Bancroft (iv. 391) enumerates various second-hand descriptions.
[1032] I do not understand Bandelier’s statement (p. 277) that it is taken from Bancroft’s plan, which it only resembles in a general way.
[1033] Bancroft classifies their architectural peculiarities (iv. pp. 267-279).
[1034] See Vol. II. ch. 3. Bancroft (ii. p. 784) collates the early accounts of the habitations of the people, and (iv. 254, 260, 261) the descriptions of the ruins and statelier edifices, as seen by these explorers.
[1035] For. Q. Rev., xviii. 251.
[1036] Cf. Poole’s Index, p. 1439.
[1037] Bancroft, iv. 145; Field, no. 1138; Leclerc, no. 1217; Pilling, p. 2767; Dem. Review, xi. 529. Cf. Poole’s Index, P. 1439.
[1038] Registro Yucateco, ii. 437; Diccionario Universal (México, 1853), x. 290.